Да ли верујете да су људи крочили на Месец?

[Milan Nikolic]

Пола милиона људи - математичара, инжењера, научника, техничара, итд. - је било запослено у мисији Аполо.

[Gerhard]

One of the most famous photos from the moon landings shows a rock in the foreground, with what appears to be the letter “C” engraved into it. The letter appears to be almost perfectly symmetrical, meaning it is unlikely to be a natural occurrence. It has been suggested that the rock is simply a prop, with the “C” used as a marker by an alleged film crew. A set designer could have turned the rock the wrong way, accidentally exposing the marking to the camera.

NASA has given conflicting excuses for the letter, on the one hand blaming a photographic developer for adding the letter as a practical joke, while on the other hand saying that it may simply have been a stray hair which got tangled up somewhere in the developing process.

[Gerhard]

The two photos from the Apollo 15 mission shown above clearly have identical backdrops, despite being officially listed by NASA as having been taken miles apart. One photo even shows the lunar module. When all photographs were taken the module had already landed, so how can it possibly be there for one photo and disappear in another? Well, if you’re a hardcore conspiracy theorist, it may seem viable that NASA simply used the same backdrop when filming different scenes of their moon landing videos. NASA has suggested that since the moon is much smaller than Earth, horizons can appear significantly closer to the human eye. Despite this, to say that the two hills visible in the photographs are miles apart is incontrovertibly false.

[Gerhard]

The cameras used by astronauts during the moon landings had a multitude of cross-hairs to aid with scaling and direction. These are imprinted over the top of all photographs. Some of the images, however, clearly show the cross-hairs behind objects in the scene, implying that photographs may have been edited or doctored after being taken. The photograph shown above is not an isolated occurrence. Many objects are shown to be in front of the cross-hairs, including the American flag in one picture and the lunar rover in another.

Conspiracy theorists have suggested NASA printed the man-made objects over a legitimate photograph of the moon to hoax the landings – although if they really planned on doing this, then why they used cross-hairs in the first place is a mystery.

[Juan Valdez]

[Gerhard]

One compelling argument for the moon landing hoax is the total lack of stars in any of the photographic/video evidence. There are no clouds on the moon, so stars are perpetually visible and significantly brighter than what we see through the filter of Earth’s atmosphere.

The argument here is that NASA would have found it impossible to map out the exact locations of all stars for the hoax without being rumbled, and therefore left them out – intentionally falling back on an excuse that the quality of the photographs washes them out (an excuse they did actually give).

Some photographs are high-quality, however, and yet still no stars are shown. Certainly eerie, considering you can take pictures of stars from Earth in much lower quality and still see them.



[Gerhard]

 

In order to reach the moon, astronauts had to pass through what is known as the Van Allen radiation belt. The belt is held in place by Earth’s magnetic field and stays perpetually in the same place. The Apollo missions to the moon marked the first ever attempts to transport living humans through the belt. Conspiracy theorists contend that the sheer levels of radiation would have cooked the astronauts en route to the moon, despite the layers of aluminum coating the interior and exterior of the spaceship.

NASA have countered this argument by emphasizing the short amount of time it took the astronauts to traverse the belt – meaning they received only very small doses of radiation.

[Juan Valdez]

[GeniusAtWork]

Ja lepo napisao par stranica unazad da Mesec uopšte ne postoji. Evo, čovek lepo objasnio:

 

http://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/

[Kolega2357]

Ja lepo napisao par stranica unazad da Mesec uopšte ne postoji. Evo, čovek lepo objasnio:

 

http://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/

Svaka ti čast kada kažeš da Mesec ne postoji a i može se Mesec videti danju. 

[Juan Valdez]

Svaka ti čast kada kažeš da Mesec ne postoji a i može se Mesec videti danju. 

 

То што ти мислиш да видиш Месец не значи да је то стварно Месец.

[Kolega2357]

То што ти мислиш да видиш Месец не значи да је то стварно Месец.

Poptuno si u pravu. 

[Милан Ракић]

Na stranu šala ali, mene barem, poražava činjenica da je 100-nak forumaša "glasalo" na ovoj temi i da gotovo polovina njih misli da čovek nije bio na Mesecu... Ili možda "troluju" temu...

[Gerhard]

Da su bili na Mjesecu, bili bi jos koji put do sada. Sta je to za njih.

[Juan Valdez]

Da su bili na Mjesecu, bili bi jos koji put do sada. Sta je to za njih.

 

Били су шест пута. Наравно, на лажном Месецу, пошто прави не постоји.