Partnersko nasilje nad MUŠKARCIMA

[Млађони]

Mission Statement

The past 50 years have been a time of remarkable change in the world of western women. With the help of technology and forward thinking, our society has thrown off sex-based expectations and limitations for women, allowing them important, long-deserved access to the path of self-actualization.

We now live in a world where a woman’s role in life is one of choice, not a destiny shaped by tradition, determined by biology, or forged in law. This, we think, is as it should be.

This revolution in freedom and identity, however, will not be complete until the same standards find their way into the lives of the average man. The absence of that complementary change in the lives of men has created an imbalance that erodes the autonomy of both sexes. Unless this changes, that imbalance will worsen.

Freedom from sex-based expectations for just one sex will never result in freedom for either sex. It is simply a foundation of exploitation on which tyranny is built and administered.

As a society, we are already on that path. The noble idea of freedom and equity between the sexes has been corrupted. It has become a malignancy on our social consciousness. What used to be cooperation between sexes is now gynocentric parasitism that inhabits every level of men’s existence, from cradle to coffin. The efforts to enhance the rights of women have become toxic efforts to undermine the rights of men.

It is time for equity-minded men and women to engage in the final push for freedom for both sexes, and indeed for all human beings. It is time for the interests of humanity to take precedence over the interests of men and women as political factions and social adversaries.

It is time for a movement that truly favors humanity, not a particular sex. It is time for feminism to fulfill its promise of equality, and to quit making a mockery of it.

With those humanist ideals guiding our path, we hereby proclaim the mission of A Voice for Men as changing the dialogue on issues including but not limited to the following

 

• • Male Genital Mutilation, euphemistically known as “circumcision,” must end. Neither religion nor tradition will excuse the sexual mutilation of children.

  • Ratify the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) precisely as it was originally written, and sign it into law. Or the equivalent in other countries if they do not yet have equal rights as a matter of law.

  • Selective Service must either be abolished or include women.

  • Reproductive rights, choice in parenthood for men. Consent to sex is not consent to parenthood. Upholding this idea for women while denying it to men must end. Men must be allowed to unilaterally reject parental rights and obligations during the same period of time in which a woman may legally obtain an abortion. The identified father must be served with legal notification of the intent to use his assets for the benefit of a child while an abortion is still legal or the right to use said assets by the mother is forfeit.

  • Paternity testing should be mandatory on demand by any alleged father at any time. No man shall be held legally responsible for a child he did not father.

  • Paternity fraud should be punishable under law under the same standards of any other form of fraud.

  • Affirmative Action programs based on sex must be abolished

  • Abolish the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), and retroactively audit its beneficiaries for accountability with funds used.

  • Abandon the Duluth Model and all patriarchy theory-based models of domestic violence in favor of non-ideological evidence-based solutions and programs.

  • End primary aggressor laws.

  • End mandatory arrest laws.

  • Require all state and federally funded DV programs to extend full and equal services, including shelter, without regard to sex.

  • Sever family courts from Title IV-D money.

  • Implement the assumption of joint legal and physical custody during divorce.

  • Allegations of intimate partnership violence or violence toward children in divorce proceedings must be proven in criminal court before they may be used as reason to deny physical or legal custody.

  • Dispense with child support except in special circumstances.

  • End alimony except by prenuptial agreement.

  • Make prenuptial agreements irrevocably binding.

  • Marriage should be based solely on contract law.

  • Reverse the Dear Colleague Letter, return honor courts to their intended purpose of handling academic code violations. College tribunals are not equipped to address felony criminal matters.

  • End federal funding and provide penalties for universities that interfere with the rights of men to form campus groups.

  • End rape shield laws.

  • Establish the equal treatment of males and females by all aspects of the criminal justice system.

  • Rape and other forms of sexual assault shall not be based on “penetration” or any sex-specific characteristic, but based on clearly stated lack of consent, except in the case of those who cannot express a meaningful lack of consent due to age or mental incapacity. 

  • Prohibit state interference in any sexual relationship between consenting adults.

  • “Infanticide” shall be considered murder, the killing of a human being, regardless of the sex of the perpetrator.

 

♦♦♦

 

Our Values

• • • AVfM regards gender ideologues and all other agents of misandry as a social malignancy. We do not consider them well-intentioned or honest agents for their purported goals and extend to them no more courtesy or consideration than we would klansmen, skinheads, neo Nazis, or other purveyors of hate. We will educate them where they are willing to learn, but hold them accountable for their ignorance as much as their actions;
    • We take no side at all in partisan political struggles and, after weighing the evidence at hand, generally view all organized mainstream political options as gynocentric;
    • We support and endorse only non-violent reactions to feminist governance and in fact are trying to prevent future acts of violence that feminist governance has already inspired;
    • We oppose gynocentrism in all its forms;
    • We oppose all state authority over or interference in the private lives of consenting adults engaged in any form of interpersonal relationship;
    • We take no stand on religion or lack of religion. We neither endorse nor oppose religious principles.

http://www.avoiceformen.com/policies/mission-statement/

[Млађони]

Broken, dokumentarac o dva muskarca posle razvoda:

 

[Млађони]

Kako feministi sabotiraju zastitu muskaraca koje su zrtve nasilja? 
Ovakvim laznim statistikama

[Млађони]

Jos jedna u nizu propagandi feminista.
Umesto, STOP PORODICNOM NASILJu, stop NASILJU NAD ZENAMA. 

Jer nasilje na muskarcima ne postoji, tako nam kazu statistike socijalnih sluzbi.

 

[Млађони]

Zoran je godinama bio žrtva nasilja nad muškarcima: Prošao sam torturu da bih zaštitio svoju decu

O ovome se ne prica...Jedan od retkih ljudi ciji se glas i slucaj cuo.

Zorana Mitrovića iz Beograda bivša supruga nije mogla da tuče, ali se zato poslužila mnogo opakijim metodama kako bi došla do njegove imovine. Psihološko mučenje kroz koje je ovaj preduzetnik prošao podseća na pravi holivudski triler, ali je iz svega na kraju ipak izašao kao pobednik.

http://www.blic.rs/vesti/hronika/zoran-je-godinama-bio-zrtva-nasilja-nad-muskarcima-prosao-sam-torturu-da-bih-zastitio/2zfpsnk


- Govorila je da nisam pravi muškarac, i stalno je imala razne provokacije i izazivanja. Na kraju je izmislila da sam je tukao i otišla u sigurnu kuću, iako nije imala nijednu povredu niti sam ikada imao prijavu u policiji. Ali poverovali su joj na reč. Otišla je, i nakon što mesecima nije videla decu, jednog dana se pojavila u obdaništu i uzela decu, koja su tada imla 4 i 6 godina. Rekla je vaspitačici da će samo na kratko da ih uzme, a otišla je i nije se vratila. Odvela ih je sa sobom u sigurnu kuću, i zabranila mi da ih viđam - kaže Zoran, koji tvrdi da nikada ne bi digao ruku na suprugu. Kasnije je to i dokazao, ali ne pre nego što je prošao kroz pravu torturu.

 

[Млађони]

Nasilje nad muškarcima od strane žena

Ako bi vam neko rekao da vašeg komšiju od metar i devedeset tuče supruga od „metar i žilet“ verovatno biste se nasmejali. Ne, nije šala, već svakodnevnica mnogih muškaraca. Možda je teško poverovati u priču o muškarcima kao žrtvama nasilja, ali prihvatanje ravnopravnosti polova podrazumeva i prihvatanje činjenice da uloga žrtve nije „privilegija“ žene. Međutim, nezavisno od proklamovane polne ravnopravnosti, trpljenje nasilja, biti žrtva, nema nikakve veze sa polom niti sa tim ko je fizički jači. I najjačeg čoveka može da savlada desetogodišnjak, jer i taj snagator mora da zaspi. Patrijarhalni obrazac je načinio da kad pričamo o nasilju to najčešće činimo u kontekstu žene žrtve i muškarca nasilnika, ali nisu zanemarljive brojke koje pokazuju da ima i obrnutih situacija i da su žene te koje gaze dostojanstvo partnera. Prvenstveno emocionalno, psihički, a neretko i fizički. Prema nekim procenama, u čak 40% slučajeva nasilja u porodici zlostavljači su žene, a najagresivnije su mlade devojke i žene u menopauzi.

Ženama je teško priznati da su žrtve nasilja a muškarcima još teže. U većini zapadnih zemalja postoje dobro organizovane mreže podrške zlostavljanim ženama, postoje sigurne kuće, o nasilju se javno govori, a žene se podstiču na prijavljivanje muškaraca zlostavljača. Muškarci do skoro nisu imali ništa od navedenog, osim podsmeha i nerazumevanja okoline.Tek je sredinom jula 2009. godine osnovana Sigurna muška kuća,prva na Balkanu, kao utočište muškarcima koji su žrtve „nežnijeg pola“ u okolini sela Supska,u opštini Ćuprija.

 

http://www.kapitalmagazin.rs/nasilje-nad-muskarcima-od-strane-zena/

[Млађони]

Dok se uporno prica o tome kako drzava ne radi puno na zastiti zena, muskarci zavrsavaju u zatvor zbog nenasilnog "zlocina" ne placanja alimentacije

http://www.alo.rs/stotine-oceva-u-zatvoru-zbog-alimentacije/2033

[Лапис Лазули]

3 minutes ago, Млађони рече

Dok se uporno prica o tome kako drzava ne radi puno na zastiti zena, muskarci zavrsavaju u zatvor zbog nenasilnog "zlocina" ne placanja alimentacije

http://www.alo.rs/stotine-oceva-u-zatvoru-zbog-alimentacije/2033

De mi pojasni sta je ovde nepravda nad muskarcima svega ti? Evo ja nisam u fazonu da je nevazno nasilje nad muskarcima i td.stvarno me znaima. 

[Млађони]

4 minutes ago, *Jелена* рече

De mi pojasni sta je ovde nepravda nad muskarcima svega ti? Evo ja nisam u fazonu da je nevazno nasilje nad muskarcima i td.stvarno me znaima. 

To sto zene u vecinu slucajeva dobijaju decu i alimentaciju, cak i kada muskarci zele podeljeno starateljstvo( i nema nekih opravdanih osnova da muskarac ne dobije podeljeno). Muskarci nemaju nikakvu kontrolu kako zene trose taj novac, ali su duzni da ga palte ili zaglave na robiji.

Kada se razvode, izuzetno je lako da zena dobije decu (i alimentaciju) a izuzetno tesko muskarac da dobije iste(cak i ako nema nekih osnova tipa bio je nasilnik).

I na kraju, samo ne fer tretiranje socijalnih sluzba, ako se muskarac i zena svadjaju dranjem ispred deteta oni izlazer sa pretpsotavkom da je muskarac nasilnik. Jer po nekoj logici ona ima pravo da se dere na njega on na nju nema.

Dakle imamo slucaj, gde pored onih koji su zasluzili robiju.

Preporucujem dokumentarac "devorce corp" 

 

[NemanjaVa]

5 minutes ago, *Jелена* рече

De mi pojasni sta je ovde nepravda nad muskarcima svega ti? Evo ja nisam u fazonu da je nevazno nasilje nad muskarcima i td.stvarno me znaima. 

Zato što ima žena koje lovu od alimentacije troše na šminku i provode....nisu sve samohrane majke fine

[Млађони]

1 minute ago, NemanjaVa рече

Zato što ima žena koje lovu od alimentacije troše na šminku i provode....nisu sve samohrane majke fine

Da, to je jedan od problema sa kojim se suocio moj poznanik. Alimentaciju koju je placao zeni je trosena na to da ona ide po beogradskim splaovima i da se provodi i da dete (koje je njoj sudom dodeljno, svedocenjem socijalnih sluzbi) ne vidja majku po nedelju dana a cuvaju ga baba i deda. 

[NemanjaVa]

Sd ću ja slikovito da dočaram jedan slučaj ženskog nasilja. pre jedno dvadeset godina, kod mene u selu, komšinica dohvatila komšiju (nisu muž i žena) i pribila ga uz štalu, i počela tući štapom. Dopk ga je udarala, svo vreme vikala ,,Ubi me, u pomoć!"

[Млађони]

Управо сада, NemanjaVa рече

Sd ću ja slikovito da dočaram jedan slučaj ženskog nasilja. pre jedno dvadeset godina, kod mene u selu, komšinica dohvatila komšiju (nisu muž i žena) i pribila ga uz štalu, i počela tući štapom. Dopk ga je udarala, svo vreme vikala ,,Ubi me, u pomoć!"

da, i zanimljivo, sta mislis kome bi vecina poverovala? 

[Лапис Лазули]

2 minutes ago, NemanjaVa рече

Sd ću ja slikovito da dočaram jedan slučaj ženskog nasilja. pre jedno dvadeset godina, kod mene u selu, komšinica dohvatila komšiju (nisu muž i žena) i pribila ga uz štalu, i počela tući štapom. Dopk ga je udarala, svo vreme vikala ,,Ubi me, u pomoć!"

 

Управо сада, Млађони рече

da, i zanimljivo, sta mislis kome bi vecina poverovala? 

 joj ja se duboko izvinjavam ali sam se ziva ismejala na ovo.

OK sad kapiram celu frku, posto je i moja spontana reakcija bila krajnje nelogicna, mogu tek da zamislim policuju, pa ubili bi ga od zezanja da ih je ne daj Boze zvao.

[NemanjaVa]

2 minutes ago, Млађони рече

da, i zanimljivo, sta mislis kome bi vecina poverovala? 

U ovom slučaju većina je verovala komšiji, ta žena nije bila baš pod vinklu......