Избори у САД 2016. - Бернард Сандерс

[Grizzly Adams]

Неке женске о Клингтонки...

 

Још 24 сата и горов овај циркуз... Доста је било вала...

[Аурор]

1 minute ago, Grizzly Adams рече

Доста је било вала

Not. That. Sentence.

[Aurelije]

1 hour ago, ☺︎ Juan ☺︎ рече

Али ове ваше теорије завере су већ постале луђе од свега што смо до сада видели. Шта ће вам то? Исто као они што по сваку цену желе да покажу да је уранијум крив за рак, као да је НАТО бомбардовање мање злочиначко без тога. Или као да је Хилари Клинтон мањи злочинац ако није ишла да кува пилеће ногице и крилца слепог миша (и све то о кувању закључено на основу једног мејла Марине Абрамовић кога је прималац проследио свом брату). 

A teorija da Tramp ima nekog u FBI kome je obecao nesto u zamenu za to da otvara istrage protiv Hilary ti nije luckasta? 

Sta je tebi konkretno problem kod Trampa? 

[Aurelije]

2 hours ago, ☺︎ Juan ☺︎ рече

 Живимо у матриксу и треба нам црвена пилула коју ће донети Господ Трамп лично. 

Tramp nece to doneti, tramp ima mana koliko hoces, ali kako je rekao Michel Moore "Trump is biggest f-u in human history". To je f-u koji narod salje politicarima, njihovim ortacima u medijima. Majkl Mur je i pored te realizacije resio da glasa za Hilary. 

[Grizzly Adams]

Уживо... Ваљда задњи...

[Grizzly Adams]

Tom Woods:

Цитат

I don't endorse political candidates anymore. I'm retired from that.

I observe the spectacle as a curious outsider, but that's about it.

Still, I've commented with great interest on the Trump phenomenon and the reaction to it. I've never seen anything like it.

Trump says plenty of provocative things, so there's no need to make things up about him. He obviously never said all Mexicans were rapists, but some people genuinely believe he did. He never put down veterans with PTSD as weak. And he certainly never mocked a reporter's disability -- that story was completely made up.

(Yes, I've seen the video of what Trump did -- but he makes that hand gesture when he criticizes all kinds of wimps and creeps, and in any case Trump's physical gesture in no way resembled that reporter or his disability.)

To my mind, though, all of Trump's boorishness put together is but a grain of sand next to the Iraq slaughter George Bush presided over and Hillary cheered.

(And I don't buy the "Trump supported the war" stuff; his three uninspired words in favor amount to nothing next to everything else he said at the time.)

Donald Trump is very poorly read and seems to know little about the world around him, sniff the sophisticates. (Admission: I myself have registered this complaint.)

This is quite unlike George W. Bush, of course, who we all know spoke five languages when he wasn't quoting John Milton, composing sonnets, or shedding new light on the is-ought problem.

And oh, no, say the neocons and the GOP establishment: Trump doesn't talk about "limited government"!

Because that's what the world needs: more "talk" about limited government.

Where were these alleged conservatives when George W. Bush was pushing No Child Left Behind, government support for homeownership, Medicare Part D, and his countless other sins against limited government, including the bailouts during the financial crisis?

They were either making excuses, or fruitlessly wringing their hands.

Meanwhile, Bush was spreading universal human rights throughout the Middle East -- a project Edmund Burke (if only Bush knew who that was) would have scorned as leftist and insane.

At no time did they repudiate him.

Incidentally, for all their caterwauling about Trump's insufficient conservatism, what view held by National Review or the Weekly Standard these days could be described as conservative? What, apart from leftist rhetoric and legislative and social victories, do these knuckleheads think they're conserving?

And make no mistake: Trump's success is a poke in their eyes as well. Here they were, in all their manufactured outrage at the uppity masses who chose Trump over Jeb Bush, and not a single thing they said or did could stop it.

They've been paper tigers all along.

A vote for Trump, stated simply, is a middle finger to the media, the academic establishment, the entertainment world, the Social Justice Warriors, the elites of both parties, all of it.

Who in his right mind doesn't want to give those people the middle finger?

Nationalism, fascism, authoritarianism, blah blah blah -- as if any of that is substantively different from what we already have. This is a revolt against the establishment at all levels, and it transcends Trump himself, who almost certainly does not appreciate the full significance of his role or what is happening.

To my mind, Trump's main fault is that if anything he's been much too conventional.

His team is a joke: the change America needs involves Rudy Giuliani, Ben Carson, Chris Christie, and Newt Gingrich? Give me a break.

His message is: these particular people I oppose have screwed you. Not the system -- the system is fine, citizen! Let us hear no complaints about the system! Let's simply eject these bad people, and we'll "take our government back."

Blech.

If someone took office and simply stopped bombing, returned diplomacy to American foreign policy, and disengaged -- even just to a limited extent -- from domestic intervention, I'd be plenty satisfied.

Will Trump do that? I don't know. There's plenty to be concerned about, that's for sure.

I do know Hillary's intentions, and they're horrifying all around.

The media, the politicians, and even many libertarians dismiss Trump's supporters with the usual names: racist, sexist, xenophobic. (I have no idea why Japan, with zero immigration, is never called xenophobic -- couldn't be that our delicate flowers have a double standard!)

There's a far more charitable way to understand Trump supporters: they are in open rebellion against an establishment that can't stand the sight of them.

The state apparatus only exacerbates the ideological divisions that exist between people, because it imposes one system on everyone. If this election cycle proves anything, it's that different folks should be allowed to go their separate ways.

Let the Clintonistas go be governed by Harvard Ph.D.'s. (Btw, for my sticklers, you do insert an apostrophe when making Ph.D. plural.) Let the rest of us figure out what we want, and in general leave each other alone.

http://www.tomwoods.com

 

 

[Аурор]

@florenntina

 

[Grizzly Adams]

Какви су ти прогресивци глупаци (и расисти), погледајте пажљиво овај видео:

 

[Аурор]

Sjajno pitanje...

 

[Аурор]

HIGH ENERGY

 

[florenntina]

8 hours ago, Grizzly Adams рече

Горка је та зарада кад знаш шта следи...

А нико да се запита - откуд уопште то да берза толико "цима" на изборе? Зашто би цене на берзи уопште биле зависне од тога ко је прецедник? И ту негде у грму лежи зец. Тј. слон. Тј. аждаја.

Kapiram sta si hteo reci i slazem se vezano za uticaj politike na biznis generalno.

Medjutim, u slucaju berze u sustini kapital prelazi iz jednog dela berze (ekvitija koji imaju vece oscilacije i potencijalno vece prihode) u drugi, sigurniji deo sa manjim prihodima (bondovi i prifrdi).To je ekonomski skroz logicno jer investirori beze od nesizvesnosti a to uvek ide pod ruku sa promenom politickog pravca i tu dolazimo do dela o kome si ti pisao i gde je zaista pravo pitanje zasto bi politika uopste imala toliki uticaj na ekonomiju itd...

Ali ovo sam htela da objasnim. Kada padaju ekvitiji, kaze se da berza pada iako u vecini slucaja ona ostaje "ista" u smislu da se kapital samo seli iz jednog u drugi deo berze...Naravno ima i povlacenja novca u kes ili zlato ili nekretnine itd ali najvece "seobe" su u sustini one koje sam opisala.

[florenntina]

@ Gospodin Darealis,

Hvala za video, pogledacu malo kasnije.

Ja inace verujem da je za zdrav psihicki zivot vazno ziveti iskreno, u skladu sa svojim emocijama. Zato sam danas iskoristila rast i izasla sa berze, tako da sutra mogu nepodeljeno da navijam za Trampa i logicki i emotivno, bez prepreka bez obzira sto svi prognozeri tvde da ce da izgubi 

[Grizzly Adams]

Где ли је ове нашо, какве лујке...

[florenntina]

1 hour ago, Grizzly Adams рече

Где ли је ове нашо, какве лујке...

E to je bas ta ostrascenost o kojoj sam pisala i koju i dalje ne umem da objasnim. Sto je najgore, ove devojke, bar sudeci po onome sto citam i gledam po internetu od pocetka kampanje, su pre pravilo nego izuzetak kada pricamo o pristalicama Hilari. 

[florenntina]

Klintonova otkazala vatromet u slavu svoje pobede unapred?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914082/amp/Clinton-campaign-CANCELS-New-York-election-night-fireworks-display.html?client=safari