Deus herbarius

[Bernard]

                           

 

Le cardinal Jorge Urosa Savino, 79 ans, ancien archevêque de Caracas, au Venezuela, est décédé du Covid-19 le 23 septembre.

Urtosa avait été admis aux soins intensifs à la fin du mois d'août. La Cigüeña De La Torre (InfoVaticana.com, 23 septembre) en parle comme d'un "cardinal remarquable bien que François ne l'aimait pas."

François a envoyé Urosa en retraite anticipée à 76 ans, ce qui contraste fortement avec ses amis qu'il maintient en fonction jusqu'à près de 80 ans.

Lors de son vol de Bratislava à Rome, François, très légaliste quant au Covid, s'est moqué du cardinal Burke ("ironie du sort") en le traitant de "négationniste" parce que Burke n'était pas "vacciné" et a contracté le Covid-19.

La question est maintenant de savoir comment François va expliquer la mort pour cause de covid d'un cardinal "vacciné".

[Bernard]

                             

 

Kakor današnji Zahod, je bila tudi pozna carska Rusija obsedena s spolnostjo, ki je popolnoma brez primere v prejšnji ruski kulturi. Med družbenimi in intelektualnimi elitami so bili spolni avanturizem, razglašanje perverznosti in vse oblike čutnosti nekaj običajnega.

 

Pa ne le med elitami, tudi delavske množice, osamljene v mestih, brez cerkva, ki bi povezale njihovo vest s kesanjem, ali vaških govoric, ki bi se jih morali sramovati so si dajale duška z nebrzdano spolnostjo.

 

Konec uradne cenzure po vstaji leta 1905 je odprl vrata erotični literaturi, ki se je obnavljala v spolni strasti. Čutnost dobe je bila v pravem pomenu besede demonična, Satanov lik se je za umetnike in glasbenike spremenil v pravega romantičnega junaka. Občudovali so demonično voljo, ki se pri izpolnjevanju svojih želja ali pri uveljavljanju svojega hotenja ne ustavlja pred ničemer.

 

Hannah Arendt -  The Origins of Totalitarianism

[Bernard]

 

[Bernard]

[Bernard]

Nekateri hočejo videti v Jezusu iz Nazareta samo reformatorja judovstva, drugi pa samo zadnjega izmed prerokov. Privrženci nasilja so ga opisovali kot revolucionarja, tolstojevci kot učitelja neupiranja, okultisti kot »posvečenca« ezoteričnega reda in sovražniki tradicionalnih družbenih smernic kot borca zoper rutino. V Indiji sem spoznal kar nekaj hindujcev, ki so me hoteli prepričat, da je Jezus bil shakti avesha avatar, so pa tudi takšni, ki trdijo, da je bil samo veliki jogi.  

 

Nekaj ganljivega je v težnji vseh in vsakogar, da bi pristopili k temu Jezusu Kristusu s strani svoje osebnosti in svojih interesov ter našli v njem samega sebe ali odkrili v njem vsaj kakšen delež . Po drugi strani se je v takih poskusih pokazala ozkost ljudi, ki so hoteli razvozlati »Jezusovo uganko« le na podlagi lastnih zelo enostranskih pogledov.

 

[Bernard]

 

We are not through this pandemic. I wished we were, but I prayed a lot to God during this time.

And you know what? God did answer our prayers. He made the smartest men and women, the scientists, the doctors, the researchers, he made them come up with a vaccine.

That is from God to us. And we must say, “Thank you, God. Thank you.”

And I wear my vaccinated necklace all the time to to say “I’m vaccinated.”

All of you. Yes, I know you’re vaccinated. You’re the smart ones.

But, you know, there’s people out there who aren’t listening to God and what God wants. You know this. You know who they are.

I need you to be my apostles. I need you to go out and talk about it and say: “We owe this to each other.”

We love each other. Jesus taught us to love one another. And how do you show that love but to care about each other enough to say, “Please get vaccinated, because I love you. I want you to live.”

I want our kids to be safe when they’re in schools. I want you to be safe when you go to a doctor’s office or a hospital and are treated by somebody.

You don’t want to get the virus from them. You’re already sick, or you wouldn’t be there. We have to solve this, my friends. I need every one of you. I need you to let them know that this is how we can fight this pandemic, come back to normal, and then start talking about the real issues that we have to: fighting systemic racial injustice.

 

There is only one possible way that any of her words could have any kind of truthful meaning. Her use of the word “god” is actually Satan.

If by the word “god” she means her god, who is actually Satan, then everything she says makes perfect sense. Because true believers don’t listen to the voice of Satan, but to the voice of God. And we won’t take the “vaccine,” because it represents the “mark of the beast,” Satan.

Jesus himself condemned people who claimed to know and represent God, but in fact represented Satan.

“You are doing the things your own father does.”

“We are not illegitimate children,” they protested. “The only Father we have is God himself.”

Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came from God and now am here. I have not come on my own; but he sent me. Why is my language not clear to you?

Because you are unable to hear what I say. You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.” (John 8:41-44)

If you have not yet watched the documentary by Australian Altiyan Childs, you can benefit greatly in understanding the day and age we are currently living through by watching his insider perspective on Freemasonry, which is the main religion of the rich and powerful of this world, and how they use symbols and imagery that sometimes seem to represent truth and the Bible, but are actually part of Satanism.

[Bernard]

German MEP: 'More People Died from Covid Vax in 2021 than in the Last 20 years from all Vaccines Combined' (Video)

 

“Dear [EU] commission, pull the emergency brake on these vaccines and stop this experimentation on humans. I beg you!” – MEP Joachim Kuhs

 

 

RAIRFOUNDATION.COM

---

"Dear [EU] commission, pull the emergency brake on these vaccines and stop this experimentation on humans. I beg you!" -...

 

[Bernard]

Today forced vaccines – tomorrow organ harvesting?

 

                                                

 

DR Torsten Trey, the founder and executive director of Doctors Against Forced Organ Harvesting (DAFOH), gave an interview recently about China’s use of prisoners of conscience to provide organs for transplants. 

Dr Trey notes free voluntary consent is a foundation in Western medical systems and that the Chinese regime would like to tear that down in order to make forced ‘donations’ the international ‘common standard in transplant medicine’. The goal, as he puts it, would be to rubber stamp the use of political prisoners as ‘a life source, a living pool of organ donors’.

The implications of Dr Trey’s statements for the future of treatments in the West and even NHS policies when taken in the broader context of the last year and a half are horrifying. There is no longer any ‘free voluntary consent’ when it comes to the Covid vaccination programmes. We are no longer living under the auspices of a democratically elected Government acting in UK interests but instead a Chinese-inspired machine intent on domination over, not service to, the British people.

Since free and voluntary consent has gone out of the window with initiatives to coerce (and mandate in some sectors) vaccinations, on the grounds that we must all be jabbed to protect our fellow citizens, what is to stop the medical tyrants from ruling that if you have vital and healthy organs you must give them up for the common good as decreed by the state?

And what about nations such as Australia and America which are already building internment camps for returning travellers or for the unvaccinated? These sites will be set up with those unfortunates who have dared to travel abroad and for prisoners of conscience whom the government deems a ‘threat to public health’.

Will the non-compliant who are sent to quarantine camps or re-education centres be used as repositories for desperately needed organs under a triage system favouring patients with deep enough pockets to influence the decision-makers?

A sub-class raised for organ donation was the subject of Kazuo Ishiguro’s 2005 dystopian novel Never Let me Go. Ishiguro’s clones are created (possessing human emotions such as falling in love and experiencing pain) with the sole purpose of helping society’s chosen ones to live longer.  

The parallel to Ishiguro’s scenario of medical tyranny may seem far-fetched as of yet. But we are living in an era so completely warped by Covid that there is no way to know for certain where it will all end.

Into every single facet of life the pandemic mental sickness has permeated. It’s an aberration that will not stop within a few years. As society’s essential fabric is pulled apart thread by thread, we are witnessing the unravelling of many constructs. Along with it the dismantling of medical ethics, including jettisoning free and voluntary consent for treatment such as a vaccine. Where will the line be drawn and will consent still be required in a couple of decades for one’s organs to be donated?

When I press the button on my talking Yoda doll and he says ‘Fear is the path to the dark side’, he confirms my haunting suspicion that the terror and strong-arm tactics inflicted on us over the last year and a half are only the beginning, and a force will drag us all to the dark side.

In an article for Unherd last year Mary Harrington discussed ‘the extent to which the pandemic is forcing Western nations to become more like China’. Let’s hope she is not correct in the assumption that, where China leads the West will follow.

Today forced vaccines – tomorrow organ harvesting? - The Conservative Woman

WWW.CONSERVATIVEWOMAN.CO.UK

---

Today forced vaccines – tomorrow organ harvesting?

State-Sanctioned Killing for Organs Could Spread Beyond China If Not Challenged: Dr. Torsten Trey

WWW.THEEPOCHTIMES.COM

---

The Chinese regime's practice of forced organ harvesting often uses prisoners of conscience as a living pool for ...

 

[fsa]

"MORALNO JE PRIHVATLJIVO PRIMITI VAKCINU" Katolička crkva podržala vakcinaciju protiv korone

https://www.blic.rs/vesti/svet/moralno-je-prihvatljivo-primiti-vakcinu-katolicka-crkva-podrzala-vakcinaciju-protiv/ehwez8g

 

[fsa]

Catholic Moral Teaching and Tradition on COVID-19 Vaccines | California Catholic Conference

WWW.CACATHOLIC.ORG

---

The Vatican’s doctrinal office, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), has determined that it is “morally acceptable” for Catholics to take these vaccines against the COVID-19 Virus. ...

 

[Bernard]

                              

[fsa]

[Bernard]

 

We are not the first Catholics to live in a time of severe crisis.
Look at the 4th century: Most bishops were heretics. They embraced and promoted Arianism, which denied the divinity of Christ. Then in the 5th century, violence between Christians was widespread as Church leaders debated the Church’s Christology—monks would literally assault bishops in the street whom they believed were heretics. 

An apparently ecumenical council proclaimed heretical doctrine and had to later be condemned. 

Almost 1,000 years later, the Great Western Schism wreaked havoc on the Church, as three different men claimed to be pope and average Catholics had no way to know who was right and who was an imposter.

Too many Catholics today are content to talk about historical crises while whitewashing our current crisis. To criticize today’s ecclesial leaders is off limits, even though we can condemn Arian bishops of centuries ago. Somehow criticizing today’s Church will lead Catholics astray, even if they know past hierarchs were sinful, heretical, and even just plain awful.

But this isn’t a sign that there are too many critics in the Church; it’s a sign that the Catholic “immune system” is weak. A robust immune system isn’t one that’s never challenged—it’s one that can withstand challenges and fight them off. A person who has been exposed to many viruses and diseases is often far stronger than the one who has been isolated from the outside world. Hiding our problems only leaves us with Catholics with weak faith immune systems—when they do find out about scandal X or crisis Y (and they will find out), their faith collapses. Far healthier is the faith that knows the history of the Church, as well as the current situation, and is able to keep its eyes on Christ.

We are told to hide our blemishes because bad news doesn’t evangelize. However, hiding blemishes isn’t evangelization, it’s marketing. Evangelization is the proclamation of the truth, and sometimes truth can be uncomfortable or even scandalous. Does this mean we should obsess over bad news? No, that would be as unbalanced—and contrary to the truth—as pretending it doesn’t exist. We should always put the bad news in perspective, and that perspective is the infinite graces showered on the Church—and on us through the Church.

The strongest organizations are ones that are anti-fragile. To be anti-fragile is to become stronger, not weaker, in the face of stressors. A cult is inherently fragile, because any slip-up by the cult leader can lead to its total collapse. The Catholic Church is inherently anti-fragile: she has seen crisis after crisis and has weathered them all. Her survival is not dependent on good prelates or good popes (although those do help her flourish). Her divine institution doesn’t mean that she avoids human crises, but that she overcomes them. 

That overcoming can take years, even decades or centuries at times. So when we are in the midst of a significant time of crisis—as we are today—it can look as if we will never get out of it, that the Church will ultimately fail. That conjures up fears, and it makes us want to cover up the blemishes in an effort to protect the Church. But the Church needs no protecting. She is not a house of cards; she is a fortress built upon Jesus Christ, the Rock who never crumbles. Catholics have nothing to fear by the airing of dirty laundry; quite the contrary, we know that exposing scandals, heresies, and corruption can be an immunity-strengthening process that makes our faith not weaker, but stronger.

[Bernard]

                               

 

Document of the Second Vatican Council, for example, Guadium et Spes, which defines the “common good” as “the sum of those conditions of social life which allow social groups and their individual members relatively thorough and ready access to their own fulfillment.” The crucial point here is that if individual persons do not have “ready access to their own fulfillment,” then the common good cannot be achieved. 

The Catechism of the Catholic Church defines conscience as “a judgment of reason whereby the human person recognizes the moral quality of a concrete act that he is going to perform, is in the process of performing, or has already completed. In all he says and does, man is obliged to follow faithfully what he knows to be just and right.”

In Church teaching, the relationship between common good and conscience becomes clear. Man’s “access to his own fulfillment” requires his ability to follow his conscience. Society’s good is achieved through the individual person’s good, and his or her ability to access that good. If you remove man’s individual liberty to do “what he knows to be just and right,” you make impossible the true common good.

The right of conscience does not merely exist alongside common good; conscience is a component of common good. 

The attack on conscience is devastating to the common good.

The silencing of conscience leads to the dehumanization of the world.”
 

[Bernard]

 

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith specifically stated that “vaccination is not, as a rule, a moral obligation.” Though the CDF does allow the reception of serums that were produced “with cell lines from aborted fetuses,” it specifically recognizes “reasons of conscience” for those who refuse vaccines on that basis. 

In other words, there is no teaching that says that because the Catholic Church allows such vaccines a person must receive the vaccine. Indeed, to claim as much requires not just ignorance of Church teaching, but faulty logic. Simply because a person is morally permitted something does not mean, therefore, that he is required to do that thing—or even that he ought to do that thing. 

Broadly speaking, though the Church might allow remote cooperation in an evil action, the Church certainly upholds a conscientious objection to that cooperation.    

 Regardless of what a pope, bishop or cardinal’s position is on the reception of vaccines, he should be demanding that vaccines—and all medicines, for that matter—are produced ethically. 

Cell lines…that do not involve cells from abortions are available” to produce a COVID-19 vaccine, so using a tainted cell line is not necessary.