Jump to content
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
Ромејац

OCU activists cut locks on UOC church in Malinsk, Rovno region

Оцени ову тему

Recommended Posts

ZuvRkd_5d6e078690cb99_59066365-tmb-720x411xfill.jpg

OCU raiders attacked the temple of the canonical Church in Malinsk

 

There is currently an attempt to seize Sts. Peter and Paul’s Church of the UOC in Malinsk. According to eyewitnesses, the situation is very critical.

Today, on September 3, 2019, at about 7:00, OCU supporters cut locks on the Holy Apostles Peter and Paul Church of the UOC in the village of Malinsk of the Berezno district.

According to eyewitnesses, about three dozen people came to the temple in early morning and immediately began to cut down the locks. The first to see this was the abbot, Archpriest Vasily Gnes, who had been on watch at the church for several months in a row because of the constant threats of the OCU activists to take it over. Castles were cut in a matter of minutes, activists, among whom were local school teachers and many non-residents, led by their "priest", immediately went inside the temple.

“It was still very early, I didn’t even think that they would do it so early,” said Father Vasily. “As usual, I was going around the churchyard when a crowd with a flag approached the church door the door and started to cut locks. “I immediately began to call my parishioners and people themselves rushed to the church.”

As archpriest Sergiy Kaminsky, a clergyman of the Sarny Eparchy, a native of the village and rector of the Assumption of the Most Holy Theotokos Church in neighbouring Kuzmovka of the Sarny district, said that in the morning he arrived in Malinsk and, coming up to the church, saw a large group of strangers in camouflage there.

“At the moment, all are waiting, there is no open confrontation, only separate cross-talks between locals,” he said. “Of all the situations that have been around the temple, this is the most critical. The locks were cut off at about 7:30, and their tool bag was left.”

As of 9:00, the head of the village arrived at the scene of the incident and asked everyone who was not a member of the religious community to leave the church fence.

As it became known later, the believers managed to defend their temple. Inside the religious building, they found all the intruders' tools: hammers, grinders, saw blades, pliers and even binoculars.

“They (OCU supporters – Ed.) didn’t stay long in the church because a lot of people gathered and drove them out of the territory,” said Father Vasily, the rector of the church. “I am proud of my parishioners, women and men, who are ready to stand to the end for the Orthodox faith and not give up the church, which is native, prayed.”

The believers are praying in the church and planning to guard the religious building. Perhaps, the parishioners will remain inside the church overnight, therefore, they ask all those who care to support with prayers the believers, who for the fifth month in a row have been forced to resent the church raiders from the OCU.

The UOJ is monitoring the developments.

We recall that a previous attempt to seize the temple in Malinsk occurred on April 23, 2019. Thanks to the assistance of the RSA deputy Anatoly Rudkovsky, who held talks with both communities and the police, the raider seizure was avoided.

The UOJ editorial board reminds: in case of violation of the rights of the episcopate, clergy, laity and institutions of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (obstruction of worship, seizure of churches, provocations pressure, threats, etc.), you must immediately contact the Legal Department of the UOC by telephone: 097- 537-55-96.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Придружите се разговору

Можете одговорити сада, а касније да се региструјете на Поуке.орг Ако имате налог, пријавите се сада да бисте објавили на свом налогу.

Guest
Имаш нешто да додаш? Одговори на ову тему

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Сличан садржај

    • Од Ромејац,
      Why Constantinople registered its organization of one person at the address of the Czech monastery.
      It has become known from open sources that the Patriarchate of Constantinople began to create a parallel jurisdiction in the Czech Republic, in the canonical territory of the Orthodox Church of the Czech Lands and Slovakia (OCCLS) and registered a “monastery” subordinate to Phanar. What are the Phanariots striving for and what may their plan of forcible takeover of this Local Church be?
      Christianity was brought to Moravia by Sts. Equal-to-the-Apostles Cyril and Methodius, who are also called the Moravian brothers. In 869, Pope Adrian II ordained St. Methodius to the rank of Archbishop of Moravia. This was before the fall of the Roman Church, which happened almost 200 years later, in 1054. Thus, the first Mother Church for the OCCLS was precisely the Orthodox Sazavska Monastery, and Orthodoxy disappeared from these lands for almost 800 years. Only at the end of the 19th century Orthodox temples appeared in the Czech Republic, which the Russian Church built for vacationers from Russia in Czech resorts. There appeared a Czech Orthodox community in Prague, which was also led by a priest from the Russian Church.
      However, amid political disagreements between Russia and Austria-Hungary, and then World War I, the Austrian authorities did not register this Orthodox community in Prague and it legally belonged to the community of the Serbian Orthodox Church in Vienna. The Serbian Church ordained the first bishop for the Czech and Slovak lands, Bishop Gorazd (Pavlik). Thus, the Serbian Church became the second Mother Church for the OCCLS.
      Bishop Gorazd put a lot of efforts in the formation of the Church in Czechoslovakia, and in the interwar period it developed quite actively, while being in the jurisdiction of the Serbian Church. During the Second World War, Bishop Gorazd was tortured by the Nazis and became the first holy martyr of the Church of Czechoslovakia.
      At the same time, instead of supporting the work of St. Gorazd, the Patriarchate of Constantinople tried to create a parallel jurisdiction and in 1923 established its Autonomous Orthodox Church in the Czech Republic and Moravia and ordained Bishop Sabbatius (Vrabets) to lead it. However, the believers rejected him and remained faithful to Bishop Gorazd. Bishop Sabbatius retired, while the autonomous Church from Constantinople remained on paper.
      During World War II, the Czechoslovak Church was liquidated by the Nazis and revived after the victory but already in the jurisdiction of the Russian Orthodox Church. Unlike Phanar, the Russian Orthodox Church did not pretend to rule this Church and in 1951 granted it full autocephaly, thus becoming the third Mother Church for the OCCLS.
      An act signed by Patriarch Alexy (Simansky) read as follows: “The Russian Orthodox Church, represented by Patriarch Alexy of Moscow and All Russia and the entire Holy Council of Bishops, in consideration of the petition of the Church Council of the Orthodox Church in Czechoslovakia, grants autocephaly to this Church, formerly the Exarchate of the Moscow Patriarchate. The Russian Orthodox Church with one heart prays to the Heavenly Shepherd, our Head the Lord Jesus Christ so that He sends His Divine blessing to the youngest sister in the family of Orthodox Autocephalous Churches, the Church of Czechoslovakia and crowns Her with eternal glory.”
      It is noteworthy that this is the full text of the act.
      Constantinople categorically did not recognize it arguing that Saints Cyril and Methodius came to Moravia from Constantinople, therefore this is its canonical territory. Phanar was not at all embarrassed by the fact that Methodius was ordained bishop of Moravia in Rome and that for almost 800 years there was no Orthodoxy in these lands at all,.
      But even without the recognition of Constantinople, the OCCLS was developing quite successfully and by the end of the 20th century already numbered several hundred thousand parishioners.
      In 1998, the current Patriarch of Constantinople, Bartholomew, recognized the Orthodox Church of the Czech Lands and Slovakia by publishing his Tomos on the autocephaly of OCCLS. This Tomos is strikingly different from the ROC act. Whereas the act does not contain any terms on limitations of autocephaly, the Phanar’s Tomos abounds with them. Like in the Tomos for the OCU, there is an obligation for the OCCLS to receive the myrrh from Constantinople, to appeal there, coordinate all important issues with Phanar and act strictly in line with the foreign policy pursued by the Patriarchate of Constantinople.
      The OCCLS considered the Phanar-issued Tomos to be simply an internal document of the Patriarchate of Constantinople.
      However, in 2013, the Primate of the OCCLS Metropolitan Christopher (Pulz) was forced to retire due to the appearance of publications casting a shadow on his moral character. The publications, as it was established later, turned out to be slanderous, but this enabled Phanar to intervene in the affairs of the OCCLS.
      On October 19, 2013, at the diocesan meeting of the Prague diocese, which was supposed to choose a new Prague bishop, the well-known Metropolitan Emmanuel (Adamakis) of France turned up and said that Phanar would not recognize any of the candidates proposed at the meeting. This caused confusion and the congregation was not able to elect its bishop.
      In December 2013, in Prague, a meeting of the Holy Synod of the OCCLS was held, to which the locum tenens of the head of this Church, Archbishop Simeon (Yakovlevic) had already invited two Metropolitans of Constantinople – Emmanuel (Adamakis) of France and Arseny (Kardamakis) of Vienna. It was announced to everyone that these hierarchs would participate in the meetings of the Synod of a foreign Church with a casting vote.
      The rest of the Czechoslovak hierarchs resolutely opposed to this and asked the Russian Orthodox Church for protection from Phanar’s gross interference in the affairs of the Church OCCLS. Metropolitan Hilarion (Alfeyev), the head of the Department for External Church Relations, arrived in Prague. He negotiated with the Phanariots and ensured that the Synod of the OCCLS would settle its own affairs without interference from other Churches.
      The Synod of the OCCLS removed the locum tenens, Archbishop Simeon (Yakovlevic), from office and appointed Metropolitan Rostislav (Gont). And soon after the Local Council of the OCCLS elected Metropolitan Rostislav, who received 87% of the vote, as the Primate.
      It is easy to guess that Phanar did not recognize such an election and continued to consider its protégé – Archbishop Simeon – as the locum tenens thus provoking a split in the OCCLS.
      In February 2015, Constantinople further aggravated this schism, having ordained Bishop Isaiah (Slanink) for the OCCLS in order to create an “alternative Synod” of the OCCLS.
      It is not known how the situation would develop further, but in 2016 Phanar urgently needed the support of the OCCLS in the run-up to the Cretan Council. This Council, as we recall, was supposed to affirm the primacy of Constantinople in the Orthodox world, securing it many exclusive powers, and also open the way to unification with the Latins, recognizing the Vatican as an Orthodox Church along with Orthodoxy.
      Thanks to the Providence of God, Four Local Churches did not attend this Council and it did not become pan-Orthodox, in fact. But then, before this Council, Patriarch Bartholomew struggled to ensure the presence of the Primates of all Local Churches and he had no time to fight with Metropolitan Rostislav. As a result, Phanar recognized Metropolitan Rostislav as the head of the Church, while the OCCLS recognized the Tomos of Constantinople of 1998 on its own autocephaly, which puts the OCCLS in actual subordination to Phanar.
      A new attack by Phanar on the OCCLS ensued already in 2019 due to the fact that the Czechoslovak Church did not recognize the OCU and declared support for the UOC and His Beatitude Metropolitan Onuphry. On the same day when Phanar made its lawless decisions on Ukraine, on October 11, 2018, Metropolitan Rostislav sent a letter to the Russian Orthodox Church condemning the gross interference of the Ukrainian government in the internal life of the OCCLS and also stated that the position of the Church on this issue remains unchanged.
      “World Orthodoxy recognizes the only canonical head of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church – His Beatitude Metropolitan Onuphry of Kiev and All Ukraine. This fact was repeatedly mentioned and reiterated on behalf of all those present by the Holy Primate of the Great Christ Church of Constantinople, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew at the Synaxis of the Primates of the Local Orthodox Churches, which took place in Chambesy (Switzerland) from January 21 to 27, 2016. Therefore, any attempt to legalize the Ukrainian schismatics by the state authorities should be strongly condemned by all the Primates of the Local Orthodox Churches,” the letter said.
      And on February 3, 2019, on the day of “enthronement” of Epiphany Dumenko, Metropolitan Rostislav declared the following: “In fact, the Orthodox Church of Ukraine has existed for centuries – from the time of Equal-to-the-Apostles Vladimir and Princess Olga, from the day of the Baptism in the Dnieper, and it has its primate – this is His Beatitude Metropolitan Onuphry of Kiev and All Ukraine. <...> Among the high-ranking hierarchs there were those who decided to refute this, who considered for nothing what had been for centuries and proclaimed this impostor ‘a metropolitan of all Ukraine’ instead of the canonical metropolitan.”
      Of course, this position aroused the indignation of Constantinople, which launched a new offensive on the OCCLS. In August 2019, Phanar initiated the creation of a parallel jurisdiction of the Patriarchate of Constantinople in the Czech Republic. At the constituent assembly, the legal entity “Association: Holy Patriarchal Stavropegic Monastery of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary (hereinafter referred to as the Association)” was created and the statute was adopted.

      Only three people took part in the Constituent Assembly: Konstantinos Kardamakis, who is also Metropolitan Arseny of Austria (Constantinople Patriarchate), ThDr. Igor Slaninka, who is also Bishop Isaiah, and also a certain Roman Rugyko. These three established the Association and elected its chairman – “Dr. Konstantinos Kardamakis, born on October 31, 1973, residing at 13 Fleiskmarket, 1010 Vienna, Austria” and his deputy – “ThDr. (Doctor of Theology) Igor Isaiah Slaninka, born on June 25, 1980, living at the address: Jana Zizky, 1116/13, 434 01 Bridge.”
      On October 1, 2019, the Association was registered by the regional court of Ostrava city.

      What is noteworthy, in this extract in the column "number of members" there is a number 1. And the most interesting thing is that the monastery of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary at this address has already existed for a long while.

      There is not much information about it on the Internet. There are some photos on the Czech site “Light of Orthodoxy” and a little information for the pilgrims on the website "Pilgrimage Alphabet":
      “The Monastery of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary is located in the town of Vilemov, which is located in the Czech Republic. Over the long years of its existence, this convent became one of the main centers of Orthodoxy in the traditionally Catholic Czech Republic. Located in a quiet area, the monastery became a place of seclusion for a small Orthodox community. <...> Address: Czech Republic, Olomouc District, 783 22 Vilemov 159.”
      What do we have? Phanar creates a monastery under the name "Association" at the same address, on the site of a female monastic community, which has existed for many years. Moreover, the Association formally establishes three people, none of whom has anything to do with this monastic community. The number of members of the Association, according to the extract from the register, is only one person. Furthermore, the Association is subordinate not to the OCCLS, i.e. the Local Church in whose canonical territory it is registered but directly to the Patriarchate of Constantinople.
      Here is a paragraph of the Association’s statute on its goals: “The Association is a voluntary, non-governmental, non-profit association of Orthodox believers under the spiritual leadership of the Patriarchate of Constantinople, which united the advocates of the spiritual development of Orthodox citizens living in the Czech Republic and other Orthodox believers to satisfy their spiritual needs, for vigorous activity in this development, to popularize this goal and ensure charitable activities in the field of this missionary work. The task is also to lead a spiritual and liturgical life, to be engaged in charity work, to help those in need, and at the same time to create contact spiritual centers (dependencies) to fulfill this goal. For this purpose, the chairman of the association (abbot) appoints the clergy who received the canonical mission. At the same time, it has to pay attention and help protect the rights of citizens and Orthodox believers, defend their interests in accordance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedom and to make sure that no one incites hatred, intolerance, supports violence or violates the Constitution and laws.”
      We emphasize:
      The Association is subordinate to Constantinople; The Association extends its activities to all Orthodox citizens living in the Czech Republic; in the list of tasks of the established monastery (Association) there is not a word about monastic life. This means that under the guise of a monastery, a parallel jurisdiction will be established, which will expand throughout the Czech Republic, and then, possibly, will spread to Slovakia.
      The fact that the Association is supervised by the bishop, who lives in Austria, speaks of two things. First, the Association will not attract “seekers of the monastic life” but entire parishes with the clergy, laity, churches and church property. As the recent developments show, Phanar has perfectly mastered the art of “head-hunting” clerics into its jurisdiction using blackmail, threats, financial incentives, political and other pressures, etc. Secondly, if there are not so many people who want to move from the OCCLS to the jurisdiction of Phanar, not only Czech or Slovak priests will be attracted but also Phanar-loyal clergy from other countries.
      When the members of the Association are significantly more than one person, Phanar will be able to either carry out a coup in the OCCLS, bringing its people to power (the same Igor-Isaiah Slaninka), or even transfer the OCCLS to its jurisdiction having eliminated autocephaly. Such a renewed (or abolished) OCCLS will definitely recognize the OCU.
      Time will tell whether these plans are destined to come true, yet we have no choice but to pray for the Primate of the Church of the Czech Lands and Slovakia, Metropolitan Rostislav, and the faithful hierarchs of his Church wishing them to have the same stamina and courage as His Beatitude Metropolitan Onuphry of Kiev and All Ukraine.
       
      Patriarchate of Constantinople is trying to create another parallel jurisdiction in Europe - UOJ - the Union of Orthodox Journalists
      SPZH.NEWS    
    • Од Ромејац,
      Knowing that the local faithful were planning to protest and block their entry to St. Andrew’s Church in Patras, the pilgrims of the schismatic “Orthodox Church of Ukraine” changed their schedule to visit the church without incident, but the faithful were already on-guard.
      Thus, a conflict broke out between the faithful Orthodox believers of Patras and the clergy of the Church of St. Andrew when the schismatic pilgrims, including “Metrpolitans” Simeon Shostasky and Alexander Drabinko, who abandoned the Church of Christ to become schismatics, were allowed inside the church, reports the Greek outlet Oukraniko.
      The schismatics also encountered trouble on the island of Aegina, not being allowed to enter the Holy Trinity-St. Nektarios and St. Minas Monasteries. They were warmly received, however, on Evia and in Fokidos.
      The OCU pilgrims were initially scheduled to visit the church this morning but decided to visit yesterday after lunch, as it was publicly reported that there would be a protest to block them from entering the church on Thursday.
      However, the OCU schismatics nevertheless “found the faithful of Patras who were on duty in case they [the schismatic pilgrims—Ed.] would appear outside their schedule,” as “there was a suspicion that they would change their program,” as they have been doing frequently during their trip.
      “The inhabitants of Patras were in the church and found the schismatics, and [a certain] Mr. Zorbalas just happened to come in at the same time and saw that the rector of the church, Fr. Skiaradesis, was conducting a tour for the schismatics. They were near the honorable head of St. Andrew just then.”
      Oukranki reports that “while the schismatics were shooting videos and taking photos to publish on the internet, a lively altercation began between Zorbalas and the rector, who was leading a tour for the schismatics. The conflict continued for quite a while, and, probably, the schismatics will have to shoot new videos.”
      It was also reported yesterday that the faithful of Patras were to gather this morning at 6:00 for a protest at the Church of St. Andrew.
      The faithful emphasized that “we say ‘no’ to the schismatics. We are on the side of our Orthodox brothers in Ukraine, who suffer because of them. The fight has begun! The schismatics will come again, as they did to the Holy Mountain.”
      Altercation erupts in Patras church over visit of schismatics
      ORTHOCHRISTIAN.COM The OCU pilgrims were initially scheduled to visit the church this morning but decided to visit yesterday after lunch, as it was publicly reported that there would be a protest to block them...  
    • Од Ромејац,
      Patriarch Theodoros of Alexandria believes that his sudden decision to commemorate Epiphany Dumenko, the primate of the schismatic “Orthodox Church of Ukraine,” will not lead to any divisions in the Church, but in fact to a solution to the ongoing Ukrainian crisis.
      He also expressed the conviction that His Holiness Patriarch Kirill of Moscow will not stop commemorating him at the Divine services, as he has stopped commemorating Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople and Archbishop Ieronymos of Athens, according to the Greek outlet Romfea.
      Pat. Theodoros noted that in recognizing the OCU, “we made a difficult decision, very difficult.” “Pat. Theodoros could not stand the pressure from the Phanar, the Greek authorities, and the United States,” commented Archpriest Nikolai Danilevich, Deputy Head of the Department for External Church Relations of the canonical Ukrainian Church.
      Surprisingly, the Alexandrian Patriarch also expressed the conviction the Pat. Kirill will not cease commemorating him, because “as the wise Archbishop of Cyprus says, that’s not a measure” that can solve the problem.
      Archpriest Nikolai Balashov, the Deputy Chairman of the Moscow Patriarchate’s Department for External Church Relations, announced on Friday that Pat. Kirill would cease commemorating Pat. Theodoros, though OrthoChristian has not yet been able to confirm that he did in fact stop commemorating him.
      Pat. Theodoros also emphasized, as he did in the press release announcing his decision to commemorate Epiphany, that the Church has a “conciliar character” and that “the decision to recognize the OCU came after long prayers and reflections, and was discussed with all the bishops of the Patriarchate of Alexandria.”
      The Archbishop of Cyprus himself, Archbishop Chrysostomos, had emphasized in his meeting with other primates, including Pat. Theodoros, that the Church is conciliar and thus no Local Church should make a unilateral decision. However, both Abp. Ieronymos of Athens and Pat. Theodoros later decided, and Pat. Theodoros on his own, without a decision of his Synod of Bishops, to recognize the OCU.
      After “the Patriarch of Alexandria recognized the OCU, that is, the tomos, which our Ecumenical Patriarch gave, the solution to this problem will begin—a problem that troubles our Church,” Pat. Theodoros commented.
      Responding to a journalists’ remark that his position could lead to a split, not to healing, Pat. Theodoros said: “No, there will be no schism! I believe that after my intervention, other Churches will follow our Ecumenical Patriarchate. In the end, we will be united, fearing God and solving the problem in love.”
      And while Pat. Theodoros earlier encouraged the faithful of the canonical Church to stand firm in their faith and position, he is now confident that “a Church that wants autocephaly should receive it, and everyone else will see that it is no different from them.”
      Asked what he thinks about the request not to commemorate Epiphany while serving in Limassol, Pat. Theodoros declined to answer, saying he had to discuss the issue with Abp. Chrysostomos first.
      Patriarch of Alexandria: Decision to commemorate OCU will lead to solution, not a schism
      ORTHOCHRISTIAN.COM Patriarch Theodoros of Alexandria believes that his sudden decision to commemorate Epiphany Dumenko, the primate of the schismatic “Orthodox Church of Ukraine,” will not lead to any...  
    • Од Kafanski amater,
      Srpski režiser Emir Kusturica, oštar kao i uvek, objavio je autorski tekst koji je podigao na noge čitav region.
       
      Autorski tekst Emira Kusturice, prenosimo u celosti i bez ispravki na ekavicu.
       
        Kada je čovjek natjeran da gazi po plićaku vremena u kome živi, nije najgore ako uporedi vlastiti život sa podrumom pretrpanim stvarima. Posebno ako povjeruje kako tamo još uvijek ima ponešto da se nađe i da je najteže iskopati ono najvažnije! Ako tako nešto uopšte postoji! Kada se odlučimo da krenemo u potragu za najvažnijm stvarima, čeka nas gomila, čitava skalamerija se ispriječi pred nama. Ako bi tada čovjek krenuo da pretura po stalažama ne bi ga gušila samo prašina, niti bi stvar bila olakšana Rembrantovskim zracima svjetla koji se probiju kroz prozorče, brzo bi otkrio kako i ono što nije primjećivao kao važno postaje jednako bitno kao stvari koje su ranije navirale nošene talasima sjećanja. Ipak čovjek mora sebi, ako nikome drugom, da polaže račune pošto se njegov život odvija u istoriji, nikako u vakuumu, iako su u svijetu i kod nas tvrdili 90-ih da živimo vrijeme postistorije, posebno naglašavajući da je teritorija nevažna. Onda su SAD bombardovale SR Jugoslaviju ne zbog zaštite ugroženih ljudskih prava i zločina nego zbog pomjeranja vojne sile prema Istoku. U tom svojevrsnom Drang nah Osten koje su u dva svjetska rata obavljali Njemci i tako je stručno obilježili, sada je Atlanska sila pokazala mišiće ne samo nama nego i Evropi na čijem terenu se odigrala drama. Osvojena je nova teritorija.
      Dakle u potrazi za Istinom koja je pohranjena u podrumu, od nas najbolje skrivena, postoje dva puta. Ideja da jedino put do Boga vodi do Istine i njoj suprotstavljeni racionalistički put koji nas dovodi do zaključka kojeg je u filmu „Sjećaš li se Doli Bel” izgovorio otac - pijani marksista. On je rekao: „Čovjek je izgubljen slučaj!” Vjerujem da je on govorio o jedinki, tačnije uzorku, kako su je atlantisti nazvali, „zlatna ljudska milijarda”.To je po njihovoj procjeni broj ljudi na planeti koji mogu da žive koliko-toliko dobro. Preostalih 5 milijardi po njima nema lijeka, svakako su osuđeni na propast te se, kasnije, s tim u vezi, pravdaju ratovanja i civilizovanje barbara te mesijanska uloga protestantskog puritanizma. Šta im treba pitamo se? Dobar kupac koji polako pristaje na ulogu roba pošto radi za malu platu i nema istorijsku svijest, odgovara ulozi koja mu je dodjeljena i vjeruje da je podjela na bogate i siromašne sudbina! Fatalizam kapitalizma! Tako je i kod nas bilo u praksi, pored uspješnih privatizacija, sportista i umjetnika, još jedino naučna pamet kod nas uspjeva da se rodi, ali tek kada ode u pečalbu dokaže i unovči svoje sposobnosti.
      Novi tip homo sapiens je potpuno otvoreno biće, ubija vrijeme gledajući rijalitije i porno filmove, voli da laže, ali ne pristaje na iluzije, ne voli da radi, a želio bi da bude bogat, sanja da će mu Bog preko Fejsbuka poslati najbolju djevojku i jedino je tada religiozan. Otvoreni je član otvorenog društva spreman, ne samo na torture transnacionalnog kapitala, nego i transeksualnog egzibicionizma. Ako nastavi ovako, uskoro bi mogao da traži legalizaciju incesta što su neki već pokrenuli u Sjedinjenim Američkim Državama! Posljedice otjelotvorenih ideja pijanog marksiste nisu samo racionalistički zaključci nego i ono što će trideset godina kasnije, u našem plićaku, postati životna stvarnost, marksizam i liberalizam su objedinjeni transnacionalnim kapitalom obrćući kapital i čovjeka nazvanog – izgubljeni slučaj. Još od Dekarta i Voltera, preko Hegela i Kanta, Karla Marksa, Zapad je proizvodio najbolje i najgore, a ono što je do nas doprlo je najčešće bilo ono najgore. U dugom periodu od prihvatanja hrišćanstva, Zapadna crkva je objedinila bibliju, mač i kamatu, u postupku dehristijanizacije fabrikovala čovjeka ubačenog u proces lišavanja svojstava gdje su materijalni dobici i komfor zamjenili potrebu za čovečnošću i žrtvovanjem.
      Da li ćemo, pored svih stvari koje smo već prodali, staviti na doboš Istinu! Ipak, još uvijek nismo poraženi. Nevjerovatno je da smo mi, uz Ruse, preostali dio hrišćanske kulture koji nije ubačen u centrifuge atlantizma i koliko-toliko smo ostali svoji. Koliko dugo još? Zavisi od toga da li ćemo ili nećemo priznati Kosovo. I da li ćemo održati Rapubliku Srpsku. Još uvijek nas nisu do kraja lišili svojstava i što je najvažnije, nismo izgubili ideju da su naša crkva i vjera, te naša kultura, magnetne sile opstanka i naše budućnosti, a vjerovanje u vječnost duše, vrata slobode. Jer da nije tako, piše antropolog i lingvista Nikolaj Trubeckoj, ni ruski narod ne bi preživio dok je pod mongolskom vlašću, plaćajući danak, na tihoj vatri, a nikada nije bio rob, u ilegali održavao narodno hrišćanstvo koje je iz hibernacije ušlo preko Ivana Groznog, Ivana III, u fazu stvaranja carske ruske istorije. Isto je bilo i u našoj istoriji. Pod vjekovnom vlašću otomanskih Turaka, kako piše Ivo Andrić, duhovni život, a time i pismenost u manastirima Srpske pravoslavne crkve, stvarana je neraskidiva veza sa Kosovskim zavjetom ali i vremenom budućnosti. Zato je nama važna Istina o Kosovu. To je najveći intimni i socijalni motiv, bez kog bi u onom podrumu o kojem pišem, umjesto tragova preko kojih se stiže do istine, ostalo brdo nepotrebnih informacija - nered u kojem može da zavlada promaja i ne samo da ja ne bih mogao da pronađem ono najvažnije što razdvaja od plićaka vremena po kojem gazimo i vjeru da život nije prolazna epizoda. Zašto sam se onda žrtvovao i pravio tolike filmove. Zato što sam preko pokretnih slika koje su montirane u ritmu srca zakoračio u onostrano i povjerovao da postoji vječni duh.
      Ako krenemo u kopanje po podrumu, najteži zadatak bi bio kako poredati sve kako valja, jer u našem plićaku čizme postaju važnije od noge na koju se navlače, kapa od glave, rasklimani krevet uvaženiji od onoga koji je na njemu spavao, gramofonska ploča mnogo značajnija od uha i srca do kojeg je harmonija dopirala. Tako se danas živi. Čovjek je u evropskoj istoriji napravio ogroman krug, oslobodio se ropskih okova, izborio se za hrišćanstvo, poslije racionalista i protestanata žrtvovao je duhovni život u ime materijalnog dobra. Mrzilo ga da čeka raj poslije upokojenja, pa je požurio da ga napravi na zemlji. Poslije Francuske revolucije, masoni su proizveli građansko društvo, industrijsku, pa informatičku revoluciju. U međuvremenu je stvorena pozitivna uloga u stvaranju sindikalne svijesti, svijesti o zlostavljanju žena i svijesti o ugroženosti životne sredine. Taman kada smo povjerovali da će novi svijet ublažiti eksploatisanje, ono je postalo najgore. Tek danas se ostvaruje ideja pijanog marksiste – savremeni čovjek, izgubljeni slučaj, danas se vratio na početak. Umjesto kraljeva koje je srušio, dobio je faraone i svijet u kome 8% ljudi posjeduje 88% svjetskog bogatstva.
      Kada su junaci filma „Sjećaš li se Doli Bel” Dino i Kliker u lavorima ispunjenim vodom šarali očima nadajući se da će od toga zjenice blistati od sjaja, a djevojke padati kao zrele kruške u njihovo naručje, iz SFR Jugoslavije su počeli da odlaze prvi radnici u SR Njemačku, a na radiju smo, pored vijesti šta je radio i gdje je bio drug Tito, slušali Ćelentana i 24 hiljade poljubaca. Majke su glancale lavaboe i kade plavim radionom, dok su na periferijama gradova naši očevi po birtijama praktikovali titoizam, religiju nevjernika, najčešće u pripitom stanju nikada ne gubeći iz vida da je pojava druga Tita važnija od titoizma. Koliko god je bio omražen, svi su cijenili poredak kojeg je uspostavio, dok ga oni koji su ga doveli nisu srušili. Tako je Emil Sioran pisao o Ivanu Groznom kao strašilu kojem zavidimo jer je učinio sve što mi nismo smjeli ili nismo mogli, ubijao ljude. iIma ih koji tvrde da su neki čak završili na njegovoj trpezi. Mi smo mu zavidjeli jer nismo bili u stanju da napravimo sve ono što je bilo zabranjeno. I ja sam mislio da su Informbirovci voljeli Staljina pošto je on volio hercegovački duvan i imao ponosnog dilera koji mu je doturao škiju iz Popova polja. Trebalo mi je mnogo vremena da shvatim kako Titov razlaz sa njim nije bio autentična odluka nego je to odlučio isti onaj koji je finansirao boljševičku revoluciju (Njemački kralj Vilhem II, a kasnije Vudro Vilson predsjednik SAD-a), a da je Staljinova uloga u Drugom svjetskom ratu poremetila planove ne samo u civilizovanju Rusa, nego su im na kraju Drugog svjetskog rata stigli do Berlina. Kasnije je bilo što je bilo. Ljubav srpskih i ruskih komunista koja je prekinuta Informbiroom, bila je takođe investicija koju smo 90-tih skupo platili. Naša veza sa Rusima je ostala krvno srodstvo, a duhovnost je ime tog srodstva. Nisu samo visokoobrazovani bjelogardejci dali Beogradu najbolje što su mogli, nego je Nikolaj II objavio rat Njemačkoj stajući u odbranu Srbije.
      Dino i Kliker, u Doli Bel, nisu radili samo na glancanju očiju. U tek začetim duhovnim procesima oni su tragali za odgovorom na pitanja svijeta odraslih koji su mislili da su vjerovali u komunizam i kojem su oni htjeli da suprotstave hipnozu. Čim bi izvukli glave na suvo tinejdžeri su ponavljali do iznemoglosti „Svaki dan u svakom pogledu sve više napredujem” vjerujući u moć ostvarivanja vlasti nad samim sobom pomoću svjesne autosugestije, prateći ideje slavnog psihologa Emila Kuea. Sve bi bilo kako valja da nisu popustili živci šarmatnog lažova Klikera koji nije pristao na religioznu mantru. Nije se mirio sa onim dijelom „sve više”, pa je prekinuo te večeri duhovnu seansu u potkrovlju golubarnika i rekao: „Dobro to, a šta ću ja sutra?” Svi smo se smijali Klikerovom izrazu i dok je on mislio na sutrašnji sastanak sa djevojkom, nas je oduševio njegov smisao za realnost. Smisao za realnost kao zajednička osobina koja briše razliku između laži i istine, spoj jedinke sa ostatkom svijeta. Ali šta da radimo sa tim smislom danas? Upravo su nadahnuće i vjera u transcedentalnu sposobnost vode u budućnost. U nauci, fikciji i realnosti. Upravo je odstupanje od realnosti neophodna distanca za zdrav život. Koliko god Kliker nije mogao da se nađe na putu transcendencije, Dino jeste i zato je i bio glavni junak filma. Ne samo da Dinov idealizam zvuči naivno i privlačno, čak je i Klikerova laž danas bliska srcu jer nije lagao za pare. On je uljepšao svoj svijet.
      Danas, kako tvrde teoretičari naučne kulture, oni koji pokušavaju da promjene sve što je čovjek u istoriji napravio, kada Isis napada i uništi Palmiru, oni nisu uznemireni. Kada poslije bombardovanja Iraka novinari pitaju američkog generala zašto nisu zaštitili mesopotamske spomenike kulture, on odgovara da to nisu bili američki prioriteti. Šta onda jesu? Zatiranje prošlosti i hrišćanske kulture i uspostavljanje najnovijeg poretka robovlasništva i potčinjavanja planete. Za to je potrebno da Mikelanđelo bude manje važan od Endija Vorhola, Dostojevski od Den Brauna, a da sve što nas je inspirisalo u Holivudu sve do sedamdesetih godina treba presnimiti. I to se radi. Najveći dio Holivudskih hitova su rimejci i video-igre.
      Dakle, porodica nije samo ugrožena marksističkom bazom i liberalnom filosofijom na kojoj svoje veze sa svijetom već dugi niz godina ostvaruje naša država, a ljudi, šta će drugo, bježe, ne žele da budu najjeftinija radna snaga u svijetu. Jedino što prikriveni rasizam danas prihvata bijele Slovene za koje je po pangermanskim planovima bilo zacrtano zatiranje i bilo planirano odmah iza Jevreja i Roma budu izbrisani sa lica zemlje. Danas kada se više niko ne pita odakle migrant po Evropi i malo ko uzima u obzir da su ratove započeli oni koji su najglasniji borci za prava migranata. Sve se to neko nekome za nešto sveti. Stavlja se tačka na hrišćansku Evropu.
      Otac iz „Sjećaš li se Doli Bel” nije znao da će se njegove riječi otjelotvoriti u našem vremenu niti je mogao sanjati tada kako će se razviti stvar sa čovjekom – izgubljenim slučajem. Nisu slučajno na početku ove priče pomenuti prvi pečalbari koji su se otisnuli u Njemačku i druge zapadne zemlje 60-tih, a drug Tito ih optužio da su izdajnici. Danas ti izdajnici finansiraju život kod nas. Kada neki stranac nabasa u Beograd, pita se odakle ovim ljudima onoliki novac da čitav dan gluvare po kafićima i ležernije žive od onih na Zapadu. Odgovor je opet u šezdesetim godinama kada su prvi pečalbari otišli u dijasporu koja svoje viškove, iz samilosti i potrebe da budu od pomoći, pošalje godišnje 5-7 milijardi eura u otadžbinu. Bez tog novca, bila bi mrka kapa. Mi ne ostvarujemo viškove iz kojih bismo mogli da finansiramo bolji život. Eto sad i ja kao moj otac, ali šta da radim. Moj otac je bio marksista.
       
      Šta bi se desilo kada bi filmski likovi oživjeli danas? Kliker je imao veliki nos i sa njim bi se desilo isto, pretpostavljam kao i sa legendarnim Siranom De Beržerakom! Mislim da bi i jedan i drugi tražili put kako da skrate noseve. Kliker bi, pretpostavljam, obavio široke konsultacije i zaključio kako je doktor u pravu kada kaže da bi nos trebalo skratiti. Međutim, ako bi mu prilike dozvolile ne bi se on zaustavio samo na nosu. Pretpostavljam da bi elektronska slika na njegovom ajfonu otkrila mnoštvo nedostataka koje bi nastavio da koriguje. Uvijek je imao smisla za realnost. Ništa ne bi ostalo od Klikera za koga smo uz osmijeh govorili: „Kako ti divno lažeš.” Dino bi sigurno, uprkos majčinom nastojanju da ga uputi na realnost, „skrenuo” u duhovne vode i nema sumnje da bi ga plićak u kome živimo pogađao i da bi tražio utopiju. Nije isključeno da bi se stavio pod Božiji autoritet.
      Kada nekom nije najgore da svoj život uporedi sa prenatrpanim podrumom i kada realnost prijeti da u završnoj fazi procesa dehristijanizacije Evrope poništi posljednje rezerve ove kulture i kada zna da ona još uvijek pulsira na Kosovu, onda mu ništa drugo ne preostaje nego da shvati kako bi formalni gubitak Kosova i Metohije bio završni čin gaženja sve vrijednosti hrišćanske kulture, što je slučaj sa današnjom Evropom, onda bi trebalo gaziti dublje i bježati iz plićaka u kome nas drži vrijeme u kome živimo. Naše trajne vrijednosti su zavjetnog tipa. Utoliko je i namjera da Istina u čovjekovom životu igra glavnu ulogu vrijedna stvar. Čak i kad bi samo jedan govorio istinu, trebalo bi ga podržati. Istina o sudbini Kosova i Metohije kao najvećoj pljački 20. vijeka ovorena je prije nekoliko godina kao metafora. U našoj javnosti Druga Srbija regrutuje kvazinaučnike koji sa podsmjehom gledaju na ideju o izboru carstva nebeskog nad carstvom zemaljskim. Ali upravo je tu podvala. Carstvo nebesko je hrišćanska ideja u koju jedni vjeruju, a drugi ne vjeruju. Nemanjići su kovali srebrnjake trgovali i ratovali, osvajali teritorije, ali su naše divljenje izazivali svojim podvižničkim potezima. Njihovi nasljednici kopali su rude po Kosovu, svoju vojsku oblačili u najmoderniju ratnu opremu. Kako bi se inače oduprli najmoćnijoj carevini petnaestog vijeka u bici na Kosovu. Dakle, čizma koja je devedesetih tamo zagazila nije samo osvojila i zauzela teritoriju da bi disciplinovala Srbe. Oni su stali na mjesto odakle se kontroliše bogata moravsko-vardarska dolina, tu se preko Rumunije izlazi na Crno more, a preko Makedonije stiže do Soluna o kojem je maštao Bizmark. Austrougari i Njemci su to sve osvojili, ali su na kraju poraženi. Dakle, priznavanje Kosova ne bi bila samo nezalječiva rana onih koji biraju carsko nebesko nad carstvom zemaljskim, nego legalizacija pljačke koja se desila pod otrcanom firmom ljudskih prava i brigom za civile.
       
      O ovoj, kao i mnogim važnim stvarima za naš narod, najbolje je rekao upokojeni patrijarh Pavle, čije riječi stoje na počasnom mjestu u osjećanjima čovjeka koji je pomislio da je njegov život podrum pretrpan stvarima. On je rekao: „Car Lazar nije imao ništa protiv carstva zemaljskoga, ali kada je bio prinuđen da bira između zemaljskog i nebeskog, onda je on izabrao carstvo nebesko!”
       
      AUTORSKI TEKST EMIRA KUSTURICE DIGAO JE ČITAV REGION NA NOGE! Bez ustezanja o Srbima, RUSIMA, Nemcima, Kosovu, Nemanjićima, caru Lazaru... A za kraj je ostavio reči patrijarha Pavla
      WWW.KURIR.RS Srpski režiser Emir Kusturica, oštar kao i uvek, objavio je autorski tekst koji je podigao na noge čitav region. Autorski tekst Emira...  

Све поруке на форуму, осим званичних саопштења Српске Православне Цркве, су искључиво лична мишљења чланова форума 'Живе Речи Утехе' и уредништво не сноси никакву материјалну и кривичну одговорност услед погрешних информација. Објављивање информација са сајта у некомерцијалне сврхе могуће је само уз навођење URL адресе дискусије. За све друге видове дистрибуције потребно је имати изричиту дозволу администратора Поука.орг и/или аутора порука.  Коментари се на сајту Поуке.орг објављују у реалном времену и Администрација се не може сматрати одговорним за написано.  Забрањен је говор мржње, псовање, вређање и клеветање. Такав садржај ће бити избрисан чим буде примећен, а аутори могу бити пријављени надлежним институцијама. Чланови имају опцију пријављивања недоличних порука, те непримерен садржај могу пријавити Администрацији. Такође, ако имате проблема са регистрацијом или заборављеном шифром за сајтове Поуке.орг и Црква.нет, пошаљите нам поруку у контакт форми да Вам помогнемо у решавању проблема.

×
×
  • Create New...