Jump to content


  • Број садржаја

  • На ЖРУ од

  • Последња посета

Profile Information

  • Пол :

Скорашњи посетиоци профила

4934 посетилаца

Iulianus's Achievements

Дуго је са нама

Дуго је са нама (7/9)


Форумска репутација

  1. Upravo sam ja tebe hteo, kada se budeš ponovo "očitovala", da zamolim "da završiš tvoj kontakt sa mnom" i da mi se više ne obraćaš. Drago mi je što u mojoj blizini ne postoje takve osobe. (Ovo ja jope za se).
  2. Melbourne: 14 injured in deliberate car attack. ISIS called for attacks ahead of Christmas Police said two men had been arrested, and that "at this stage, we believe it is a deliberate act." http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/melbourne-car-collides-with-pedestrians-flinders-street-victoria-police/1/1115214.html
  3. Islamic India – The biggest holocaust in World History The genocide suffered by the Hindus of India at the hands of Arab, Turkish, Mughal and Afghan occupying forces for a period of 800 years is as yet formally unrecognised by the World. With the invasion of India by Mahmud Ghazni about 1000 A.D., began the Muslim invasions into the Indian subcontinent and they lasted for several centuries. Nadir Shah made a mountain of the skulls of the Hindus he killed in Delhi alone. Babur raised towers of Hindu skulls at Khanua when he defeated Rana Sanga in 1527 and later he repeated the same horrors after capturing the fort of Chanderi. Akbar ordered a general massacre of 30,000 Rajputs after he captured Chithorgarh in 1568. The Bahamani Sultans had an annual agenda of killing a minimum of 100,000 Hindus every year. The history of medieval India is full of such instances. The holocaust of the Hindus in India continued for 800 years, till the brutal regimes were effectively overpowered in a life and death struggle by the Sikhs in the Panjab and the Hindu Maratha armies in other parts of India in the late 1700’s. We have elaborate literary evidence of the World’s biggest holocaust from existing historical contemporary eyewitness accounts. The historians and biographers of the invading armies and subsequent rulers of India have left quite detailed records of the atrocities they committed in their day-to-day encounters with India’s Hindus. These contemporary records boasted about and glorified the crimes that were committed – and the genocide of tens of millions of Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhist and Jainist, mass rapes of women and the destruction of thousands of ancient Hindu / Buddhist temples and libraries have been well documented and provide solid proof of the World’s biggest holocaust. Quotes from modern historians Dr. Koenraad Elst in his article “Was There an Islamic Genocide of Hindus?” states: “There is no official estimate of the total death toll of Hindus at the hands of Islam. A first glance at important testimonies by Muslim chroniclers suggests that, over 13 centuries and a territory as vast as the Subcontinent, Muslim Holy Warriors easily killed more Hindus than the 6 million of the Holocaust. Ferishtha lists several occasions when the Bahmani sultans in central India (1347-1528) killed a hundred thousand Hindus, which they set as a minimum goal whenever they felt like punishing the Hindus; and they were only a third-rank provincial dynasty. The biggest slaughters took place during the raids of Mahmud Ghaznavi (ca. 1000 CE); during the actual conquest of North India by Mohammed Ghori and his lieutenants (1192 ff.); and under the Delhi Sultanate (1206-1526).“ He also writes in his book “Negation in India”: “The Muslim conquests, down to the 16th century, were for the Hindus a pure struggle of life and death. Entire cities were burnt down and the populations massacred, with hundreds of thousands killed in every campaign, and similar numbers deported as slaves. Every new invader made (often literally) his hills of Hindus skulls. Thus, the conquest of Afghanistan in the year 1000 was followed by the annihilation of the Hindu population; the region is still called the Hindu Kush, i.e. Hindu slaughter.” Will Durant argued in his 1935 book “The Story of Civilisation: Our Oriental Heritage” (page 459): “The Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. The Islamic historians and scholars have recorded with great glee and pride the slaughters of Hindus, forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women and children to slave markets and the destruction of temples carried out by the warriors of Islam during 800 AD to 1700 AD. Millions of Hindus were converted to Islam by sword during this period.” Francois Gautier in his book ‘Rewriting Indian History’ (1996) wrote: “The massacres perpetuated by Muslims in India are unparalleled in history, bigger than the Holocaust of the Jews by the Nazis; or the massacre of the Armenians by the Turks; more extensive even than the slaughter of the South American native populations by the invading Spanish and Portuguese.” Alain Danielou in his book, Histoire de l’ Inde writes: “From the time Muslims started arriving, around 632 AD, the history of India becomes a long, monotonous series of murders, massacres, spoliations, and destructions. It is, as usual, in the name of ‘a holy war’ of their faith, of their sole God, that the barbarians have destroyed civilizations, wiped out entire races.” Irfan Husain in his article “Demons from the Past” observes: “While historical events should be judged in the context of their times, it cannot be denied that even in that bloody period of history, no mercy was shown to the Hindus unfortunate enough to be in the path of either the Arab conquerors of Sindh and south Punjab, or the Central Asians who swept in from Afghanistan…The Muslim heroes who figure larger than life in our history books committed some dreadful crimes. Mahmud of Ghazni, Qutb-ud-Din Aibak, Balban, Mohammed bin Qasim, and Sultan Mohammad Tughlak, all have blood-stained hands that the passage of years has not cleansed..Seen through Hindu eyes, the Muslim invasion of their homeland was an unmitigated disaster. “Their temples were razed, their idols smashed, their women raped, their men killed or taken slaves. When Mahmud of Ghazni entered Somnath on one of his annual raids, he slaughtered all 50,000 inhabitants. Aibak killed and enslaved hundreds of thousands. The list of horrors is long and painful. These conquerors justified their deeds by claiming it was their religious duty to smite non-believers. Cloaking themselves in the banner of Islam, they claimed they were fighting for their faith when, in reality, they were indulging in straightforward slaughter and pillage…” A sample of contemporary eyewitness accounts of the invaders and rulers, during the Indian conquests The Afghan ruler Mahmud al-Ghazni invaded India no less than seventeen times between 1001 – 1026 AD. The book ‘Tarikh-i-Yamini’ – written by his secretary documents several episodes of his bloody military campaigns : “The blood of the infidels flowed so copiously [at the Indian city of Thanesar] that the stream was discoloured, notwithstanding its purity, and people were unable to drink it…the infidels deserted the fort and tried to cross the foaming river…but many of them were slain, taken or drowned… Nearly fifty thousand men were killed.” In the contemporary record – ‘ Taj-ul-Ma’asir’ by Hassn Nizam-i-Naishapuri, it is stated that when Qutb-ul- Din Aibak (of Turko – Afghan origin and the First Sultan of Delhi 1194-1210 AD) conquered Meerat, he demolished all the Hindu temples of the city and erected mosques on their sites. In the city of Aligarh, he converted Hindu inhabitants to Islam by the sword and beheaded all those who adhered to their own religion. The Persian historian Wassaf writes in his book ‘Tazjiyat-ul-Amsar wa Tajriyat ul Asar’ that when the Alaul-Din Khilji (An Afghan of Turkish origin and second ruler of the Khilji Dynasty in India 1295-1316 AD) captured the city of Kambayat at the head of the gulf of Cambay, he killed the adult male Hindu inhabitants for the glory of Islam, set flowing rivers of blood, sent the women of the country with all their gold, silver, and jewels, to his own home, and made about twentv thousand Hindu maidens his private slaves. This ruler once asked his spiritual advisor (or ‘Qazi’) as to what was the Islamic law prescribed for the Hindus. The Qazi replied: “Hindus are like the mud; if silver is demanded from them, they must with the greatest humility offer gold. If a Mohammadan desires to spit into a Hindu’s mouth, the Hindu should open it wide for the purpose. God created the Hindus to be slaves of the Mohammadans. The Prophet hath ordained that, if the Hindus do not accept Islam, they should be imprisoned, tortured, finally put to death, and their property confiscated.” Timur was a Turkic conqueror and founder of the Timurid Dynasty. Timur’s Indian campaign (1398 – 1399 AD) was recorded in his memoirs, collectively known as ‘Tuzk-i-Timuri.’ In them, he vividly described probably the greatest gruesome act in the entire history of the world – where 100,000 Hindu prisoners of war in his camp were executed in a very short space of time. Timur after taking advice from his entourage says in his memoirs : “they said that on the great day of battle these 100,000 prisoners could not be left with the baggage, and that it would be entirely opposed to the rules of war to set these idolaters and foes of Islam at liberty. “In fact, no other course remained but that of making them all food for the sword’ Timur thereupon resolved to put them to death. He proclaimed : “throughout the camp that every man who has infidel prisoners was to put them to death, and whoever neglected to do so should himself be executed and his property given to the informer. When this order became known to the ghazis of Islam, they drew their swords and put their prisoners to death. 100,000 infidels, impious idolaters, were on that day slain. Maulana Nasir-ud-din Umar, a counselor and a man of learning, who, in all his life had never killed a sparrow, now, in execution of my order, slew with his sword fifteen idolatrous Hindus, who were his captives“. During his campaign in India – Timur describes the scene when his army conquered the Indian city of Delhi : “In a short space of time all the people in the [Delhi] fort were put to the sword, and in the course of one hour the heads of 10,000 infidels were cut off. The sword of Islam was washed in the blood of the infidels, and all the goods and effects, the treasure and the grain which for many a long year had been stored in the fort became the spoil of my soldiers. “They set fire to the houses and reduced them to ashes, and they razed the buildings and the fort to the ground….All these infidel Hindus were slain, their women and children, and their property and goods became the spoil of the victors. I proclaimed throughout the camp that every man who had infidel prisoners should put them to death, and whoever neglected to do so should himself be executed and his property given to the informer. When this order became known to the ghazis of Islam, they drew their swords and put their prisoners to death.” The Mughal emperor Babur (who ruled India from 1526 -1530 AD) writing in his memoirs called the ‘Baburnama’ – wrote : ” In AH 934 (2538 C.E.) I attacked Chanderi and by the grace of Allah captured it in a few hours. We got the infidels slaughtered and the place which had been Daru’l-Harb (nation of non-muslims) for years was made into a Daru’l-Islam (a muslim nation).” In Babur’s own words in a poem about killing Hindus (From the ‘Baburnama’ ) he wrote : “For the sake of Islam I became a wanderer, I battled infidels and Hindus, I determined to become a martyr Thank God I became a Killer of Non-Muslims!” The atrocities of the Mughal ruler Shah Jahan (who ruled India between 1628 – 1658 AD) are mentioned in the contemporary record called : ‘Badshah Nama, Qazinivi & Badshah Nama , Lahori’ and goes on to state : “When Shuja was appointed as governor of Kabul he carried on a ruthless war in the Hindu territory beyond Indus…The sword of Islam yielded a rich crop of converts….Most of the women (to save their honour) burnt themselves to death. Those captured were distributed among Muslim Mansabdars (Noblemen)” The Afghan ruler Ahmad Shah Abdali attacked India in 1757 AD and made his way to the holy Hindu city of Mathura, the Bethlehem of the Hindus and birthplace of Krishna. The atrocities that followed are recorded in the contemporary chronicle called : ‘Tarikh-I-Alamgiri’ : “Abdali’s soldiers would be paid 5 Rupees (a sizeable amount at the time) for every enemy head brought in. Every horseman had loaded up all his horses with the plundered property, and atop of it rode the girl-captives and the slaves. The severed heads were tied up in rugs like bundles of grain and placed on the heads of the captives…Then the heads were stuck upon lances and taken to the gate of the chief minister for payment. “It was an extraordinary display! Daily did this manner of slaughter and plundering proceed. And at night the shrieks of the women captives who were being raped, deafened the ears of the people…All those heads that had been cut off were built into pillars, and the captive men upon whose heads those bloody bundles had been brought in, were made to grind corn, and then their heads too were cut off. These things went on all the way to the city of Agra, nor was any part of the country spared.” Banda Singh Bahadur was tortured to death after being imprisoned for 3 months. The heart of Banda Singh’s son was put in his mouth in an attempt to humiliate him Why we should remember The biggest holocaust in World History has been whitewashed from history. When we hear the word HOLOCAUST most of us think immediately of the Jewish holocaust. Today, with increased awareness and countless cinema films and television documentaries – many of us are also aware of the Holocaust of the Native American peoples, the genocide of the Armenian peoples in the Ottoman Empire, and the millions of African lives lost during the Atlantic slave trade. Europe and America produced at least a few thousand films highlighting the human misery caused by Hitler and his army. The films expose the horrors of Nazi regime and reinforce the beliefs and attitude of the present day generation towards the evils of the Nazi dictatorship. In contrast look at India. There is hardly any awareness among the Indians of today of what happened to their ancestors in the past, because a great majority of historians are reluctant to touch this sensitive subject. The World seems to either ignore or just does not seem to care about the many millions of lives lost during the 800 – year long holocaust of Hindus, Sikhs and Buddhist in India. The Indian historian Professor K.S. Lal estimates that the Hindu population in India decreased by 80 million between 1000 AD and 1525 AD, an extermination unparalleled in World history. This slaughter of millions of people occurred over regular periods during many centuries of Arab, Afghan, Turkish and Mughal rule in India. Many Indian heroes emerged during these dark times – including the 10th Sikh Guru – Guru Gobind Singh and also the Hindu Maratha king – Shivaji Maratha – who led the resistance against this tyranny and eventually led to its defeat by the late 1700s – after centuries of death and destruction. The modern World today is facing a global threat from organizations and groups of terrorists such as the ISIS, Taliban and Al-Qaeeda – whose ideology is chillingly similar to that of the perpetrators of the World’s biggest holocaust in India. Let us hope that the bloody lessons of the past are learnt so that history does not even have the remotest chance of repeating itself. (https://www.sikhnet.com/news/islamic-india-biggest-holocaust-world-history)
  4. Znači ima. Nas dvoje živimo u dva sasvim različta i zaista, zaista toliko udaljena univerzuma da mi nije uopšte jednostavno da ti pojasnim koliko smo različiti, u svakom smislu. Kada bih, recimo, imao vremena, a bogami i volje, da ti samo naznačim u kratkim crtama koliko su naši svetovi udaljeni jedan od drugog, trebalo bi mi strašno mnogo vremena, kao što rekoh negde. Ali, napokon, kada bih to i uradio (što ne znači da jednom neću da pokušam) ne verujem da bi ti mogla uopšte išta da shvatiš od rečenog (što znači da ne vredi niti pokušavati, ipak). Shvati sve ovo kako god hoćeš. Nije me briga.. svejedno mi je. ... Bilo šta tumačiti "internet patriJotama" veoma je stresno i dozlaboga naporno i, nadasve neproduktivno (ovo ja kao za sebe, ne obraćaj pažnju).
  5. Potrudi se malo. "Traži, traži pa ćeš naći..." Ne mogu ja tebe, Sofi draga, toliko "omalovažiti" koliko si ti već omalovažena svojim besmislenim (da ne kažem - nehrišćanskim) stavovima i svojim (ne)razmišljanjem...itd. Mrzi me da crtam.
  6. Ti da išta čitaš možda bi i uspela da vidiš "da li objavljuju članke u njihovim novina kako su Srbi pomagali i spasavali tokom rata". Tvoja srBska "zapitanost" je začuđujuća, u najmanju ruku. (Ko te samo drži u tom "inozemstvu", teško njemu).
  7. Samo polako, molim te. "Prosućeš" na heroje (ako već nisi).
  8. Dr. Sekula Stanić, heroj! Gledajući u maju 1992. kako u Foči gore zapaljene kuće njegovih komšija Bošnjaka, doktor Sekula Stanić je od stida i očaja sam zapalio svoju kuću, sjeo na stolicu i gledao kako i ona zajedno sa ostalim kućama izgara do temelja. Bio je to veliki gest uglednog fočanskog Srbina. Doktor Sekula je bio pedijatar i direktor fočanske bolnice, a premlaćen je i ubijen u julu 1993. u Foči, zato što je spašavao život svojim kolegama, ljekarima bošnjačke nacionalnosti. Tomo Buzov Hrvat, iz Rudina u Kaštel Novom. Samo, eto, da je šutio, kao ostalih hiljadu putnika u vlaku 671. Ali nije mogao. Ustao je sa svog sjedišta i glasno uzviknuo: „Stanite, ljudi, šta to radite!? Ima li u ovoj zemlji zakona?“ Iz vlaka/voza su odvedeni 18 muslimana i I Tomo, svi streljani. Sjecanje na zrtve iz voza 671 se obiljezavaju bacanjem ruza u Drinu…Osamnaest ruža za devetnaest žrtava: za jednu od njih nije bilo ni ruže ni molitve, nije bilo ruze za Tomu. Goran Čengić ubijen je u ratu. Ubio ga je osuđeni ratni zločinac Veselin Vlahović Batko. Goran je čuo kako pomenuti maltretira njegovog komšiju Husniju Ćerimagića i pritekao u pomoć žrtvi. Vlahović ih je obojicu poveo sa sobom, bio je 14. juni 1992., i ubio. Tijela su im pronađena devet godina kasnije negdje na obroncima Trebevića. Srđan Aleksić ubijen batinama jer je stitio sugradjanina muslimana. Lazar Manojlović, pravednik svijeta. Bio je učitelj, početkom rata na poziciji direktora Osnovne škole Radojka Lakić u Bijeljini. Svoje đake i njihove roditelje, pretežno muslimane, spašavao je izvodeći ih iz Bijeljine u vrijeme kad je Arkan po njoj ubijao. Đoka Stevanović, vozio je Smaila Ribića s namjerom da ga preveze preko granice. Zaustavili su ih pripadnici Vojske RS-a i rekli mu da se vrati kući, a da će oni preuzeti Smaila. Nije se želio razdvajati. Obojicu su ih odveli u logor Luka i ubili. Đoko je kući ostavio suprugu s dvoje malodobne djece. Neđo Galić, u Ljubuškom nema pomena na Neđu Galića koji je Bošnjacima davao lažne isprave kako bi se spasili od logora i moguće egzekucije. Refik Višći, bio je vojnik Armije RBiH koji nije dozvolio drugom vojniku da maltretira srpske zarobljenike zbog čega je ovaj pucao u njega i usmrtio ga. Crnogorski admiral Vladimir Barović na Visu je počinio samoubojstvo, zbog agresije JNA i crnogorskih rezervista na Hrvatsku. To je po njemu predstavljalo djelo koje je u potpunoj suprotnosti s crnogorskom časti. Barović je odbio služiti takvom zlu, pa je svoju čast vlastitom voljom platio životom. U oproštajnom je pismu kao razlog samoubojstva naveo agresiju JNA protiv Hrvatske, a kao Crnogorac nije se htio boriti i uništavati hrvatski narod, koji kako je tvrdio, njemu ništa nije skrivio. Amir Reko iz sela Gudelj kod Goražda bivši je oficir JNA, koji je spasao 45 srpskih civila iz sela Bučje od sigurne smrti. On je to učinio samo tri dana nakon što mu je srpska strana u kući spalila majku i nekoliko članova porodice. Pjesnik Vladimir Srebrov (org. Milan Nikolić) Tokom rata je ostao u Sarajevu aktivno politički angažovan podržavajuću građansku opciju u BiH. Već prvih ratnih dana Srebrov je Karadžića nazvao ratnim zločincem, mnogo prije nekih bošnjačkih političara. Uhapšen je 1992. godine, na prevaru od strane četnika na Ilidži, kada je krenuo na pregovore o primirju, o snadbjevanju opkoljenog Sarajeva strujom, vodom i plinom. Osuđen je za izdaju, uz smrtnu kaznu – strijeljanjem. Biva zatvoren u zloglasni zatvor Kula, gdje je 39 mjeseci bio izložen najužasnijim torturama. Kaznu mu preinačuju u petogodišnju robiju. Preživjeli logoraši Bošnjaci svjedoče o tome kako dok ga četvorica četničkih grmalja „razvaljuju od batina“, Srebrov se dere „Bosna, Bosna, Bosna“. 21.oktobra 1995. godine, Srebrov je polumrtav razmijenjen. Od posljedica zatvorskih batina, Vladimir Srebrov je umro u Sarajevu 1999.godine u 45-toj godini života. Ima puno Gorana, Aleksa, Toma, Nedja, Refika…..ali ne žele da se zna! Nemojte ih zaboraviti! Arijana Galić http://www.6yka.com/blogovi/blog/23374/nevidljivi-heroji
  9. Iulianus

    Да се раздрмамо...

    Pa zar kod vas u namastiru ne priređuju ovakve čisto muške, monaške, zabave, hoć` da rečem igranke? Šalu na stranu, ovo su sufije (ili sufiji) i upražnjavaju "dhikr"* (zikr), tj. "neprestano spominjanje i sećanje na Allaha". Ne znam tačno kojem tarikatu (redu) pripadaju, pošto su ovo momci sa Kavkaza. Koliko se ja razumem ovo mogu biti Nakšibendije, njihov severni ogranak. Ali nemoj da me držiš za reč. *Dhikr - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhikr
  10. Murat Bayaral made the proclamation on religious TV in Turkey. His intervention Islamisation of Turkey under President Recep Erdogan. President Erdogan does not have a beard, which raises many questions. By Josh Robbins An Islamic preacher in Turkey launched a scathing attack on clean-shaven men, claiming that they "look like women" and provoke "indecent thoughts". Murat Bayaral's intervention, made on a religious TV channel on 16 December, has highlighted the increasing Islamisation of Turkey under President Recep Erdogan "Men should grow beards. One of the two body parts that separate men from women is the beard," Bayaral said. "For example, if you see a man with long hair from afar you may think he is a woman if he does not have a beard. Because nowadays women and men dress similarly. God forbid! You could be possessed by indecent thoughts," he added. The preacher, who enjoys a sumptuous bounty of well-groomed facial hair, made the comments as Turkey's secular heritage looks increasingly under threat. President Erdogan, who does not have a beard relies on a conservative support base, which is eager to see a muddying of the separation between mosque and state. Evolution was removed from science classes in public schools earlier this year and girls are now allowed to wear headscarves when attending school. Enrollment in religious schools has leaped from 63,000 children to 1,000,000 since Erdogan first rose to power in 2002, Politico reported. "Turkish debates on piety and modesty reoccur frequently," Magdalena Kirchner, a fellow at the Istanbul Policy Center in Turkey, told Newsweek. "Erdogan declared in 2012 his intent to raise 'devout generations,' and former Deputy Prime Minister Bülent Arinc stated in 2014 that women should not laugh out loud in public," she added. Turkish president Recep Erdogan is suspiciously beardless Adnan Abidi/Reuters While Bayaral is a marginal figure in Turkey, Kirchner warned that his statement demonstrated that the government's pious base exerted "bottom-up pressure against [a secular] way of life without having to impose legal constraints." Turkish school are not only being injected with a lot more religious studies, but also a lot more Erdogan studies. The 63-year-old is increasingly competing with Turkey's founding father General Ataturk for space on the national curriculum. The president appears to have consolidated his grip on Turkey after a controversial referendum in April cleared the way for him to transform the parliamentary system into an executive presidency. Mostafa Kemel Ataturk established Turkey as a secular state in the 1920s. However, Erdogan has promised to "raise a devout generation" against the secular establishment. An Iraqi man who fled Isis uses a pair of scissors to trim Odd Andersen/AFP The enemies, real or imagined, of Erdogan's vision for Turkey, are an educated and liberal elite living in Istanbul, who have a taste for alcohol. Preacher Bayaral's claims are a reminder of the widening polarity within Turkish society. The beard is a pressure point for Islamist and Islamophobic policies alike. Militant groups such as Isis have previously forced men living under their jurisdiction to wear beards, while China's authoritarian government has banned men belonging to the Uyghur Muslim minority population from sporting facial hair. Contrary to Bayaral's claim, scientific studies have never shown that men without beards provoke "indecent thoughts". However, several have demonstrated that homophobic men are more likely to be repressing gay desires. http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/beardless-men-look-like-girls-provoke-gay-thoughts-says-muslim-preacher-1652159?utm_source=social&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=%2Fbeardless-men-look-like-girls-provoke-gay-thoughts-says-muslim-preacher-1652159 MORE
  11. Ih, da sam ti ja "brat Zoki" ne bi se ti tako bez posledica izvukao odavlen, bre! Kada bi te "brat Zoki" obradio bio bi sav u virtuelnim modricama, a to bi bilo prilično bolno (posebno za dušu). (A, da, umalo zaboravih - pozdravila te teta Đana)
  • Креирај ново...